Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M13 (30 mins) and M101 (50 mins) with a 6" RC - Updated


Adreneline

Recommended Posts

I decided it was time to bite the bullet and try to improve my 6" RC collimation with a star test; it's still not perfect but it's better than it was!

Having stressed myself out I pointed the RC+ASI1600 at M101 (for 50 mins) and M13 (for 30 mins) and this was the result.

This is my first GC so I am fairly pleased it worked out reasonably well:

M13_cal_RC1600_lpc_ABE-GHS-x2.thumb.png.2863af28129e0ffd5842c58327e40602.png

I've imaged M101 many times in the past but not at 1100mm - for such a dim target this turned out better than I expected.

M101-HDR-x2.thumb.png.31dba198fe9ba3114c730a7b1f9746f3.png

Due to my own failings calibration has proved to be a challenge but that is sortable with more time.

The RC might have a reputation for being 'slow' but it's definitely capable of surprises.

Thanks for looking.

Adrian

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nephilim said:

Lovely images there Adrian 🙂

Thank you Steve - for so little integration time they turned out far better than I expected - truth is I expected nothing - certainly nothing worth sharing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adreneline said:

Thank you Steve - for so little integration time they turned out far better than I expected - truth is I expected nothing - certainly nothing worth sharing.

Those are definitely worth sharing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Adreneline changed the title to M13 (30 mins) and M101 (50 mins) with a 6" RC - Updated

This is a second session on M13 with the reducer removed giving a pixel scale of 0.562 arcsec/pixel and implying an effective focal length of 1390mm.

This is four sessions : (25 x 60s) + (25 x 120s) + (25 x 180s) + (25 x 60s) finishing just before transit.

M13-1370mm-L-DC_NX_GHS_MLT-bias_HT-x2.thumb.png.023a8b61e937ea292079fa90b3a4ea99.png

I am really happy with the collimation now and don't think any further tinkering will improve things - quite the opposite in fact.

I used NINA to collect the data, APP to calibrate, register and integrate and PI to process using two careful and restrained applications of GHS - as little processing as I could get away with.

There is no dynamic or automatic background extraction (PI) or light pollution removal (APP) - this is literally how it came out of integration.

All I need now is some RGB to bring a bit of colour - later in the year I fear as astro-dark has all but gone.

Adrian

M13-1370mm-L-annotated.thumb.png.a071c335d6d7b05e37247c513230c090.png

Edited by Adreneline
Image updated
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.