Jump to content


photos that i can not explain, could you help me?

Recommended Posts

My name is Luiza, I am a student of Computer Engineering in São Paulo, Brazil and I would like to ask for your help.
As yesterday was the super pink moon day, I, at about 22:50, decided to take several photos of the moon using my phone and my non-digital telescope. And, analyzing the photos now, I realized that in some of them there are certain objects that I can't say exactly what they are. Could you help me identify them, please? I am not sure if they are satellites, ISS, Hubble, etc ... and I am very intrigued by themphotos.rar.

P.S: the objects are in the lower left corner of the images







Edited by luvalezim
adding images
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to SGL.

I doubt they are any of the listed - ISS, Hubble or satellites - as those move across the sky very fast and won't stay stationary.

Out of 4 features shown - I think three are external to telescope and fourth is likely reflection on the eyepiece lens (local light just reflecting as it is very strangely shaped)

Those three sources show distinct signature of eyepiece edge of the field aberrations.


If you look at those and compare them - you 'll see that they very much look like middle rendition of star aberrated by eyepiece (and possibly coma if you are using newtonian telescope).

Where were you observing from? If you know exact observation time in UTC (GMT based - not your local time), you can figure out what was in the sky next to the Moon. Maybe they are just very bright stars that your phone picked up.

There is free software Stellarium that you can use to see Moon position at exact time of observation. You can use size of the moon (half a degree) to see what is the distance between the Moon and those dots - that can help your search.

You can also lookup satellites on this website https://www.heavens-above.com/ to see if it was maybe Geostationary satellite of some sorts (these satellites are in sync with rotation of the earth and don't move across the sky - usually used for communications - like TV satellites).

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Vlaiv, they do not look like any artificial satellites that I have seen, which all appear as point sources with no structure - well to my eyes at least. Your objects have structure, the pair group look like slightly crumpled spheres illuminated from the top right and with the opposite side in shadow, whilst the elongate object looks like a partially eaten sausage (there is a less savoury analogy - but I will not use that one) but also appears to be illuminated from the same source as the pair. Both groups show what appears to be intrinsic colour - a shade of brown/orange but with one of the pair slightly darker. These factors suggest they are relatively nearby objects and nothing at high or orbital altitudes. The shape of the objects appears to remain consistent in each image so they do not appear to be aircraft strobe or navigation lights smeared out by the effect of camera movement. The interpretation of the white 'object' as being an optical artefact is quite plausible, but it appears to be keeping station relative to the brown objects in successive frames, so could be a real (maybe point source) object but with the image distorted by the camera lens into the shape you have captured. One obvious interpretation is that they are deflated or partially deflated balloons, which can appear quite unusual when seen at distance. But for balloons drifting on the wind they appear to be keeping station quite accurately and not tumbling as balloons tend to do when buffeted by the winds - which leads on the the question, do you remember if the wind direction on the night was the same as the direction of travel indicated in the different frames?


Anyway, the short answer is I haven't got a clue what you captured in those images, and everyone loves a mystery - don't they? 


Do you have any higher resolution copies?


Cheers, Barry.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Andonie
      Gear Used:
      - Nikon D3300
      - Celestron Astromaster 130EQ
      - T-ring + Barlow x2
      I will explain this as briefly as possible.
      Because I cannot photograph in direct focus with my telescope and camera, I have to use the x2. when there is a full moon, it does not enter the frame, it comes out around the edges, so I think I should make a mosaic.
      The problem is that I do not have a motorized mount, so anileation is critical.
      The problem with PIPP is that it does not correct the rotation of the moon, so it does not work for me.
      I aligned the photos in Photoshop, and exported them in tiff.
      I then moved them to Autostakkert! 3 and it stacked without any problem. Use 40% of the best frames.
      Finally, I use RegiStax6, and when using the waveletes, as seen in the image, it generates an incredibly loud noise. I don't understand what I'm doing wrong, is it RegiStax, is it AS! 3 or is it Photoshop.

      (Errors are clearly seen in the lower part of the product because I do not have a mount, but it has happened to me in other images and the same does not happen with the noise.)
      I do not understand and I am desperate as it is horrible not being able to photograph a full moon decently.
      I urgently need someone to help me. I put all the general details for you to understand, if you need to know more, please let me know. a greeting.
      (below demonstrative image)

    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface with AstroDinsk
      23 April 2021 21:35
      Celestron Nexstar 6SE
      ZWO ASI astrocamera 462mc
    • By Astrodinsk
      Moon panorama Date: 02/21/2021 Time: 20:12 +03.00 Height: 64 degrees In the constellation Taurus Lit: 69% Telescope: Sky-Watcher 150 / 750PDS Camera: ZWO ASI462MC Mount: Sky-Watcher Heq5 ProSynScan Panorama from 4 fragments Videos for 120 seconds Resolution: 1936x1096 Exposure time: 2ms Gain: 0 73FPS Added 250 frames from 8855 Software: Shooting in FireCapture Build: Autostackert 3.1.4 Wavelets and deconvolution: AstroSurface Panorama: Microsoft ICE Post-processing: Photoshop
    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface 16 April 2021 21:32 Celestron NexStar 6SE ZWO ASI 462mc
    • By CATLUC
      No extraordinary images for this lunation, because of the turbulence and the use of infrared filters.
      Here are some images of the 24th, I am working on those of the 25th which will be of the same style.
      Clear skies.
      At 75%
      At 100%
      AT 75%
      At 100%
      Mee and Hainzel
      Pitatus Hesiodus
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.