Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

A new lens, a cold night and a hunter's sword


Recommended Posts

I recently acquired a Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 lens from a fellow SGLer and, incredibly, the night after it arrived was stunningly clear and it was a new moon.  

So it was great to give it a go on the Orion Nebula with my modded Canon EOS 450D mounted on a Star Adventurer.

I took 178x 30s subs at ISO800 and stacked the best 90% in DSS with darks and flats.  Processed in Photoshop.

Clearly the central region is blown out, something that I struggled to control in processing and it might benefit from blending with some shorter subs (bit beyond me at the moment, that!).  I wish I'd framed it a bit better to get the Flame, but I was keen to centre the main nebula to counter any dodgy polar alignment.  Maybe next time.

Anyway, keen for any hints, tips etc please!

 

20210210 Orion Nebula 200mm.jpg

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tooth_dr said:

Really nice, great FOV.  What did you stop the lens down to?  Personally I am not a bit fan of the diffraction spikes.  If you didnt want them, an aperture mask would be a solution.

Thank you.

It's a fixed aperture lens (which I hadn't actually appreciated before acquiring it!), so it was at f/2.8. 

I'm actually ok with a level of diffraction spike (long-time Newtonian user!) but these are maybe a bit "busy" - I haven't really decided yet what I think of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

If you need to know whether more subs are needed then have a look at a single unprocessed image first. If that's blown out then it's back outside for you but if it isn't blown out then it's a processing problem as you've blown it yourself. 

What is a fixed aperture Canon EF lens ? Is it broken ?

Dave.

Edited by davew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, davew said:

Hi Paul,

If you need to know whether more subs are needed then have a look at a single unprocessed image first. If that's blown out then it's back outside for you but if it isn't blown out then it's a processing problem as you've blown it yourself. 

What is a fixed aperture Canon EF lens ? Is it broken ?

Dave.

Thank you - great tip.  So it’s the subs that are blown out rather than the processing then.  *looks at tonight’s forecast 🧐*

So I may be wrong on this new (used) 200mm lens, but I can see no way to stop down the aperture with an inbuilt diaphragm - please tell me I’m being incredibly stupid and missing something!!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn. Processing would have been a wonderfully warm alternative ! 🥶

The lens stops down via the camera doesn't it ? As a Nikon user I haven't much clue on the operation of the 450D.

I hope happy-kat sees this post. She will know,

Dave.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, davew said:

Damn. Processing would have been a wonderfully warm alternative ! 🥶

The lens stops down via the camera doesn't it ? As a Nikon user I haven't much clue on the operation of the 450D.

I hope happy-kat sees this post. She will know,

Dave.

Eureka!!  Mostly I use fully manual lenses (e.g. Samyang) so hadn’t realised that - now all makes sense, and turns out I was shooting at f/3.5 (bit embarasssing!!). Thank you.  That opens up (no pun intended) a lot of possibilities!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.