Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Mars: Gimp or Registax?


Nik271

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm new to planetary imaging and I been trying to get a decent image of Mars by reprocessing data from a brief spell of clear weather from a week ago (23 August).

I recorded 3 mins of Mars with Skymax 180 at 5400mm and a Canon 250d in 4k crop mode. I know this is not ideal but without tracking on my EQ5 I found that a big sensor is easier to keep the planet in view for longer and manually follow it with the slo-mo controls. I collected approx 5000 frames of which I stacked the best 5% using Pipp and AS3!

This is my best image of Mars so far but I feel it can be better (both the data and the processing). 

My concrete question for this image is this: I seem to get better results sharpening with GIMP rather than with the Registax wavelets. I'm attaching the stacked tif file and the two (sharpened + contrast boosted) jpeg files after Gimp and Registax.

Marsunedited.tif

This is with Gimp:

MarsGimp.jpg.ba0fb9e8738e91a2ac5d7e2ce43538be.jpg

 

and with Registax:

MarsRegistax.jpg.d2b667dce2956aca8ea467334155a5ca.jpg

The wavelets in Registax seem to produce a visible 'halo' around the edge of the planet and more 'grain' in the image.  I'm puzzled since people always recommend Registax for sharpening.

There could be several explanations:

1. My data is too poor for the wavelets to do their magic (pushing FL to 5400mm was perhaps too much for the camera sensor and the seeing conditions).

2. I don't know how to use the wavelets properly.

3. Mars is special as it has very low contrast and needs delicate sharpening.

I suspect it is perhaps both 1 and 2 but maybe people with more experience can comment if Mars needs more subtle editing especially when sharpening.

Thank you for your attention!

Nikolay

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

Don't try to push it too hard if it won't let you:

image.png.34be39f89c4ad1e5a4673888e1c80277.png

This is:

Registax RGB align

Registax wavelet sharpen (just a bit)

Gimp scale down + Brightness + Contrast adjustments.

 

Thanks, this looks cleaner indeed! I didn't do the RGB align.

I guess my image scale was too high, so next time I will try with 1.5x Barlow instead of 2x

The forecast for Saturday morning looks promising, fingers crossed...

Nikolay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.