Jump to content

Rosette-Old Data New Process


Recommended Posts

Since the clouds are here I am reprocessing old data, and found this from a few months ago. 

C8

QHY10 

Optolong 12nm HA, OIII

10 hours total.

The color combination in Pixinsight was: H, (H×OIII)×1.5, OIII, as RGB and Hydrogen as luminescence.

1338198367_RosetteNEW.thumb.jpg.68d308dc871df54eb4a7c97590ebe944.jpg

Comments and advice welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

Do you combine the masters in linear or stretched mode?

With so many stars in the fov, I would be tempted to apply a very gentle dose of star reduction (Morphological Transformation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

18 hours ago, wimvb said:

Nice.

Do you combine the masters in linear or stretched mode?

With so many stars in the fov, I would be tempted to apply a very gentle dose of star reduction (Morphological Transformation).

Unfortunately I had to combine them stretched because I forgot to save the unstretched versions.

I tried Morphological Transformation, but it always makes the stars look strange...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being bored, I downloaded the jpeg and had a go at it in PixInsight. Decreased the smaller stars a little and boosted contrast a (mainly darkening the background a bit). This also increases the noise. Normally I would do a little noise reduction, but since this is only from the jpeg, I didn't bother.
hunterharling_rose_pop_wstars.thumb.jpg.9a4126a4238bcb030ed326ebb8847c6e.jpg

I didn't completely remove the stars. Afterall, this target is in the Milky Way. I just wanted to dim those small pesky stars and leave the brighter ones.

I created two star masks. First one with larger structures that covered stars completely. Then one which only covered the core of stars. I subtracted the small star structure from the large star structure, leaving me with doughnut shaped stars. I softened (blurred) this mask a little and applied it to the image. Then I applied MorphologyTransformation with Morphological selection, to decrease and dim down the stars.

After stretching the image a bit, and lowering the value of the background, I applied the small structure mask and slightly brightened the cores of the larger stars with MultiscaleLinearTransformation on layers 2 and 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wimvb said:

Being bored, I downloaded the jpeg and had a go at it in PixInsight. Decreased the smaller stars a little and boosted contrast a (mainly darkening the background a bit). This also increases the noise. Normally I would do a little noise reduction, but since this is only from the jpeg, I didn't bother.
hunterharling_rose_pop_wstars.thumb.jpg.9a4126a4238bcb030ed326ebb8847c6e.jpg

I didn't completely remove the stars. Afterall, this target is in the Milky Way. I just wanted to dim those small pesky stars and leave the brighter ones.

I created two star masks. First one with larger structures that covered stars completely. Then one which only covered the core of stars. I subtracted the small star structure from the large star structure, leaving me with doughnut shaped stars. I softened (blurred) this mask a little and applied it to the image. Then I applied MorphologyTransformation with Morphological selection, to decrease and dim down the stars.

After stretching the image a bit, and lowering the value of the background, I applied the small structure mask and slightly brightened the cores of the larger stars with MultiscaleLinearTransformation on layers 2 and 3.

This looks really good, I'll have to try it out on some of my other images.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.