Stellar Asterisms (Chance or not?)

[Macavity]

Of all DSOs my favourite (unlike too many others) are Open Clusters!

AND also stellar Asterisms! Prompted by another thread that teased(!)
re. non-interest of a "random piece of sky", I noted (as ever) that a lot
of mid-distant stars (as ever!) formed intriguing groups and CHAINS! 

I suppose the classic is "Kemble's Cascade". What are the odds of that?
I suppose that is the miracle of chance, coupled with my human trait to
"find patterns everywhere"! But I wonder if some of are associated...

I suppose someone / somewhere / professional will have studied this! 
But I sense that real life "random" star fields are more interesting than
random (computer generated) random ones"? But I may be wrong!  

[avtaram]

I've been mulling over this myself especially after a session with my binoculars (fov 9*).

 

[furrysocks2]

Chains always catch my eye, particularly when they appear to be of similar magnitude - delicate and unexpected.

[martin_h]

http://www.deep-sky.co.uk/asterisms.htm

[brantuk]

I guess it all depends if the big bang happened out in the open, or next to a corner wall lol.