ollypenrice Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Focussing? Focusing? I've often wondered and, being strictly off duty since I gave up English teaching, I've never bothered to look it up. Reprehensible, I know. Then, blow me, I'm reading a book about the English language this morning in bed and there is the word itself under discussion. Well I know you can't contain your excitement so the answer is - either! You can do some focusing or some focussing but I suspect that only Gollum is allowed to focuss.... Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenwolf Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Catches me out too, Olly - I use the word (and its derivatives) often in articles and it never looks right with just one 's' but I have researched this and am happy that one 's' will suffice. What I can assure you of is that the 'k' is silent as in 'banana'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverAstro Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I blame Guttenberg and ilk. Chaucer had the right idea, and until I figure out why my speelchucker has got itself disabled in my K-Meleon browser I'm staying with Chaucer. So there ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of Clear Skies Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 When one's focus on focussing is unfocused one may be predisposed to cuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted January 15, 2017 Author Share Posted January 15, 2017 24 minutes ago, steppenwolf said: Catches me out too, Olly - I use the word (and its derivatives) often in articles and it never looks right with just one 's' but I have researched this and am happy that one 's' will suffice. What I can assure you of is that the 'k' is silent as in 'banana'. They both look wrong to me! My book's author, not being an astronomer, doesn't go into 'focuser' or 'focusser' but I think I'll go for one 's.' A focusser with too many esses looks likely to slip to me. And now I have it!!! 'A rack and pinion focuser or a Crayford focusser.' By gad, a linguistic breakthrough... Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filroden Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I think focus is one of the exceptions to the double s rule in that it can take either a single or double s. Both seem accepted in British English and single s seems more common. I think American English is more prescriptive and it would normally take the double s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnomus Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 http://www.future-perfect.co.uk/grammar-tip/is-it-targetted-or-targeted/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverAstro Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I think life is too short, untill someone comes up with an imorttalitty pil, then til then I'm not going to wory about how many elles trhaer shud be in until. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverAstro Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Who made these stupid rules anyway - no one - it came about by custom and can be changed by custom as first America showed and now the internet is following. In English at school I was terrified by the i before e except after c rule, being more interested in the sciences and amateur radio I wondered why my recievers as well as my receivers all worked just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.