Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

What's the bigger limit for planetary observing?


Recommended Posts

You should try and match your own observations of the seeing with the jet stream data and see if this is indeed influencing your seeing.

James

Good idea! I decided to write it down in a .txt file in a special folder for all the stuff astronomy related on my computer. I included the date and roughly what I saw along with the jet stream speed and location as per that forcast.

It's not very objective science as it's based off written note of my observations. But it'll still be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Regarding depth of focus, my mak is F13, but I focus by shifting the main mirror, so despite the slow F ratio, I have coarse focussing and poor depth of focus. A fast newt with a 10:1 crayford has better effective depth of focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mount a crayford on the back of my SCT; get focus in the ball park with the main knob, then fine adjustments with the crayford - going back to the experimenting topic again, i've always wondered if using a crayford on a scope which relies primarily on moving the primary mirror to achieve focus subsequently alters the "flatness" (for the want of a better term) of the field where it comes to focus. I really do need to get a better understanding of light and optics - again i've been saying that for a few years now :)

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.