Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Solar imaging 10" newt - worth the hassle?


Recommended Posts

Hi, I've seen some fantastic images of sunspots, very detailed stuff.  The images I've found seem to all use either a 6" frac or a 10" newt.  For example, the image shown on this web page:

http://realneo.us/content/sunspot-1261-hurls-cme-toward-earth-directed-blast-erupted-august-2nd-hit-earth-august-5-126

I've just finished fitting together my 10" f6.4 newt in it's final configuration (sitting on my AZEQ6) and depending on how the mirrors perform on lunar I could easily get/make a full aperture solar filter.  I've already got baader continuum & uv/ir filters.

However, I know people aren't daft and if it were easy to get such stunning results with a 10" newt I guess that's where people would be.  On Gina's thread which I don't want to derail http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/219162-how-to-do-solar-imaging/  Merlin66 suggested 100-120mm (free aperture) is the useful upper limit for the UK so it made me wonder if these stunning examples are so very rare cases I'd never see the benefit of the extra mm. and that in the UK you'd never get that.

I've also got a lunt wedge, so I could get a 100-120mm longer focal length frac (or 150mm?  a lyra optics 150mm f5.9 looks nice) sometime when funds permit (but could cost around the same as a manufactured 250mm solar filter) but I would be wondering if I'd get better results with the newt.  In the solar imaging I've been following folk seem to use a 100-120 frac (e.g. tal100) for the high res stuff - so is this the most sensible option? 

Any thoughts & comments would be most welcome  :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

Not sure if this topic is still interesting, but I am trying to do sun imaging with 12" newt scope.

Latest imaging session:

http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/220402-6th-july-2014-sun-white-light-full-disc-close-ups/

I do not own a retractor scope, so cannot say how it compares.

But it should at least be friendlier to carry/set-up :smiley:.

Best regards

Andrej

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.