Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Wife's bought a D7000 for work...


banner001

Recommended Posts

...so naturally i will be procuring it for a bit of AP :D

Never done anybefore, i dont have a tracking mount, and for the time being i will be doing unguided AP from my manfroto tripod with the standard 18-105mm lens...any pointers?

Having never had a "proper" camera ive had a read of what ISO, f and shutter speeds i should be looking at, does anyone here have any idea of what i could expect to achieve image-wise?

And if anyone is in the local area drop me a PM, i have found the local astronomy society to be more talk than action...i know how to use my 10" dob, but AP will be a massive step-up :D

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely do star trails. I have the same camera and a D200 and have some decent results.

With star trails I would try ISO800 and start at 60s exposures (will need an Intervolometer) which can be stacked using something like startrails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the light pollution, I would go for ISO400 and 30secs where I live. It means more pictures to stack but the background is darker. (With startrails you don't go deeper with longer exposures of course, as the stars are drifting, you only go deeper on the light pollution).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i go to a hill between cov and rugby, its 2-3 miles from the nearest village and about 10 miles from the city, the light pollution is worst to the east and to the west, but north and south are fine, i would estimate naked eye limiting mag to be 5-5.5 depending on atmospheric conditions...its pretty dark once you go there. its also on a "hill"...well its about 105m above sea level, which is a hill around here, and gives a 360 degree uninterrupted view...i've yet to find something better in my local area.

using a few of the calculators, if i dont want star trails, at 18mm focal length im looking at 6-10 seconds, at 60mm im looking at around 2-3 seconds, and at 105mm im looking at about 1-2 seconds. the camera seems to take good "noise-less" pictures up to ISO3200, some noise creeps in at ISO6400. ive turned off all the noise reduction options, im not 100% sure what to set the white balance to, so its currently on Auto1.

a few sites ive looked at suggest setting the aperture slightly smaller than the camera can use, for instance if the lens at 18mm focal length can use a max of f3.2, then it can be wise to set it slightly narrower, say f3.5? any truth to this, or should i just open it and gather as much light as possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on the lens and the picture. If the corners aren't important in the picture, who cares if they are a bit fuzzy? Conversely, if there is important detail to the edges, you need to stop down a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.