Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

SW 100ED vs. SW Equinox 100ED vs. Ostara 102ED


Recommended Posts

Can't believe I missed this entire thread debating the scope that I wrote a review for  :Envy:

I think most ground has been covered and last I spoke to Emad he was after the StarWave which I think should be a good buy if he can deal with the blue undercorrection or stick a minus-V on it... Altair seem to be pretty good at ensuring good optics come out of their shop so hope it works out for him. I'll forward the minor correction that the Ostara is quoted as having 'FPL-53 equivalent' glass with HKD-61 as a likely candidate, so should marginally outperform an FPL-51 lens with equally good figuring.

I think if we could get a Vixen 102 we'd all love the opportunity but sadly they've gone premium these days  :grin:

Speaking to the question of 80mm vs 100mm, I personally found it the difference between looking at the sky and viewing the sky... the extra bit of aperture seemed to return the sky to its familiar star-speckled character against the more rarified view in an 80mm. I got the same feeling looking through a 90mm Mak, I could view objects, but not the sky itself.

I keep my ST80 around for terrestrial viewing and quick trips but whenever I need to grab-and-go I follow moriniboy's example and grab the Ostara  :cool:. My only other scope in that aperture bracket was the SkyWatcher 127 Maksutov which I've just sold as it never gets used with the 102ED around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

... I'll forward the minor correction that the Ostara is quoted as having 'FPL-53 equivalent' glass with HKD-61 as a likely candidate, so should marginally outperform an FPL-51 lens with equally good figuring.

I can't find a reference to a glass type called HKD-61.

I've found these, with their Abbe Numbers, from their manufacturer catalogs - is one of them the glass you are referring to ?:

FPL-51 (Ohara): 81.54

H-FK61 (CDGM): 81.61

FCD1 (Hoya): 81.61

OK-4 (LZOS): 92.1

FPL-53 (Ohara): 94.93

CaF2: 94.99

If the mating elements have been well chosen and the figure, polish and mounting are to a good quality then all can produce very satisfying results I reckon  :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Have you still got the Ostara 102mm.  If so, after using it since 2013, what's your views now? Apologies if you've said earlier in the thread that you sold it etc.  I can only read so much in a day. I have chance of one without finder. I don't know it's optical quality and there are no test reports. But it looks in good condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.