Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Atik314L+ adn WO GTF81 first light


mytola

Recommended Posts

So, some weeks ago, the weather finally allowed for some imaging with my new setup. I had a go at m51 and m81, both L only, and ~30min total exposure. When aquiring data for m81 I think there were some guiding issue. When I did m51 I tweeked PHDs max RA duration, and it worked a little better, but I think I can still do better with the guiding.

Both stacked in DSS and postprocessed in Photoshop and Lightroom.

http://www.flickr.co.../in/photostream

http://www.flickr.co...in/photostream/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies!

I guess the real test for the scope will be to get some RGB integration, but my mount broke down before I could capture any. Just received a new RA stepper motor, so hopefully I will be able to fix it! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks x6gas! No, it was the Atik :)

The m51 is around 30 minutes, I think the m81 is about the same, maybe a little bit more. I don't remember exactly how many of the subs I used...Location is quite dark, and I think the camera ran at -30degC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Olly,

I struggled with longer subs than 3min. Don't know exactly why, but I'm going to try better PA and balance, better guide star, and then looking for flexure(hoping it's not that). I'm using the included finder/guider scope mounted on the "handle" of the gtf81. It seemd rigid, but I guess the guider could be bolted much firmer to the scope...

Don't know what is possible to achieve, but this is my typical guiding graph:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/22286049@N05/8498028847/in/photostream

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks x6gas! No, it was the Atik :)

The m51 is around 30 minutes, I think the m81 is about the same, maybe a little bit more. I don't remember exactly how many of the subs I used...Location is quite dark, and I think the camera ran at -30degC.

So sorry - didn't see the Atik in your kit list, nor in the title of the post :o

The PhD graph looks pretty bumpy to me, especially for this focal length. What settings are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the quality of the guide star wasn't too good - I barely saw it through the noise. Was using the default PHD parameters apart from the RA duration I thought, but I see that is 1000 now, which I think was the default...oh well, I have to play around a bit more next time :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.