Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

NGC1499 - Experimental with Optec reducer


swag72

Recommended Posts

I know that some of you would have seen my previous threads about my experiments with a reducer for my Pentax 75SDHF. The Astro Physics CCD67 was moved on to pastures new and with lots of help from people on here I found and Optec NextGen 0.7x telecompressor - Specifically for well corrected fields.

Eventually I managed to get the adaptors for this as it was a little tricky to connect it all together. Last night I wanted to get out and try it as I had agreed a 30 day refund with TS if it wasnt suitable.

The spacing needed was a very precise 63.4mm and I am sorry to report that I am still about 1mm over that. Another adaptor ordered and that should sort it. I am also surprised that using my Trutek superslim filterwheel (a good couple of mm's less than the Atik one for example) I am absolutely down to a hairs width of available spacing to get to the recommended. If I was using anything other than the Trutek, I'd not be able to get close to the spacing required.

Here's an image of NGC1499 taken with 352mm fov at f4.7 - 5x1200s Ha. There are still a couple of issues (spacing, tilt and also a stacking artifact) but these are all fixable. This reducer option is definitely a keeper and one worth getting right.

So if anyone out there is after a reducer for their refractor and can not find a suitable one, this may well be the answer.

I'm not posting this as a finished article, I know that it's not perfect, but I thought it would be some closure on my previous reducer threads.

post-5681-0-13471200-1356091943_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good to know Sara, thanks for posting.

I have the Optec for my HD11 but have only managed a couple of experimental subs with it (and at that point was having more issues with guiding than anything else). I had some problems with tilt due to the circular dovetail and difficulty getting to the thumb screws but replacing the supplied screws with some longer nylon ones (used for a tattoo machine of all things!) seems to have solved it... but I won't know for sure until I can do a proper imaging run with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.