starnut Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Hi is this to big/practical and heavy to cart around in my car as I live in a flat.Skywatcher Skymax 127 (EQ3-2) with goto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowan46 Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 it should be manageable to the car and back but it's not a hiking accessory. you still may need 2 journeys though as you will probably need a power pack. it should fit easily into the car although i would take the scope off and put that in a case or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Q Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 I agree with Rowan. The limit in size of any telescope you want to purchase depends on its portability - if it's too big/heavy, it won't get used as much and end up collecting dust as well as causing you to loose interest in the hobby. But DO try to get the largest aperture you can afford without hindering its portability. Best to buy "large" the first time to save money down the road with larger scope purchases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damnut Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 That Setup is nice but definitely a double trip!. Grab & go here is a st 120 on az3. Goes in the roofbox, boot or backseat, reasonably bullet proof gets the odd bit of dog slobber, sand and snow!.Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunthos Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 What you will find is that a lot of instruments are described as portable whereas, in reality, they are merely transportable (a subtle but important difference).The scope you mention seems good enough though (just don't contract "aperture fever" and buy a 12" dobo!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West End Wendy Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 I think you've got just the right balance between portability and performance there.Those mounts don't tend to fit neatly into a box, and you always seem to end up carrying the tripod separately, but it's no big deal. Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misc999 Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 According to Skywatcher the weights are:"Tube" (=Scope?) - 3.4 KgTripod - 3.76 KgWeights (which tend to be forgotten) - 5.2 Kg Giving an overall weight of around 12.36 Kg (or in old money - 28 Lbs or 2 Stones)Think of it as a bit of weight training...but worth it.Nice choice on scope I reckon as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamp thing Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 What you will find is that a lot of instruments are described as portable whereas, in reality, they are merely transportable (a subtle but important difference)Guilty as charged.Being a builder, I am used to using and moving large table saws and concrete mixers etc all the time. In comparison to them even very large Dobs are lightweight and one person manageable.These concrete mixers are still called portable as they have wheels. The table saws despite being heavy and hard work to move are also portable. The pneumatic drills we use are around 20kg- 30kg, (this is heavier than a 20" Dob mirror). These are considered handheld.It's easy to forget that not everyone has the same ability as yourself and call something portable, when as you say it's just transportable.Regards Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.