Jump to content

Best telescope for £350


Recommended Posts

For christmas I could be getting a new telescope which is better than my current one. Could do with some suggestions, my budget is around £350. Even just a website that might help would be good.

Thanks

Hady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The definition of "best scope" depends on what you plan to use it for. You won't find a design thats best then all the others on all possible areas.

For visual, a 200p or 250p will be the best all rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Acey: My current scope is the Celestron 76mm FirstScope. And I can see that dob being similar, correct me if I'm wrong :icon_salut:

Pvaz: I mainly intend to use my scope for looking at planets, although me and my mum are interested in the moon too, so planets and the moon are the points i'm looking for.

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Acey: My current scope is the Celestron 76mm FirstScope. And I can see that dob being similar, correct me if I'm wrong :icon_salut:

Aperture determines how much you see. A 200mm dob will gather almost 7x more light, while a 250mm will be about 11x.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found these:

First Light Optics - Skywatcher Startravel 120 (EQ3-2)

First Light Optics - Celestron Nexstar 102 SLT

I would quite like to buy a refractor because I've heard a lot about reflectors being hard to maintain, not sure if reflectors are better though :S. Thanks for those links, I will continue looking :icon_salut:

So what do think of those scopes for planets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi IoHady,

The star travel 120 is a great easy to use scope but you will get some false colour. I echo comments from pvaz above about the Maksutov 127 (Skymax127). Though it is altered reflector there is need to adjust any part of the optics as the secondary mirror is 'silvered' on the rear of the front corrector lens.

The Mak is ideal for planets as it is small but has a long focal length due to the folded optical path.

I would not buy before having a look at both and see which you prefer.

Good Luck

Ps stockport has a good astro shop! Where you will be able to get your hands on both!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, thanks Damnut. Will look at the Mak then :D

I'll get back to you when I've looked around, and thanks for telling me about that shop. I'm right near Stockport and didn't know it was there :icon_salut:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two choices would not be ideal for moon and planets, something like these would be better one is motorised with goto to help find things and one is on a mount which you have to move around yourself. The refractor is a different scope design to the others however - for one not nearly as compact.

First Light Optics - Celestron Omni XLT 102

First Light Optics - Celestron Nexstar 127 SLT

First Light Optics - Celestron NexStar 4SE

The Mak type may be your best bet.

Hope you get some useful advice and at least you have a bit of time before Christmas to decide!

andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For my two cents worth, I have the Celestron Nexstar 127 SLT

First Light Optics - Celestron Nexstar 127 SLT

Great scope and 5" of apeture. Goto, portable, compact and easy to set-up. FLO have also recently reduced the price as well, so it is bang on your budget. Very easy to maintain. An all-round great piece of kit in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Newtonian reflectors you have to collimate and you get 4 refraction spikes on bright objects, caused by the secondary mirror spider vanes.

With Maksutov or SCTs composite reflectors it's easier and they rarelly require collimation but the design means longer cool down times.

With refractors you can avoid this small hassles for a lot more money. The cheap ones display halos around bright objects (color aberration) the good ED or APO ones will cost over 5 times as much as a newtonian with the same aperture. The cost per inch means you'll see less for the same amount.

It's really a case where you have to pick your poison. :icon_salut:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi IoHady,

I used to have a 102mm Mak in my kit and with that the four moons and banding are visible, Saturn looked great too, so your 127 will be better as it gathers more light. Stockport bino & telescope centre will have em all for you!. If you can keep some pennies for a couple of eyepieces BST explorer are excellent for the dosh c£35.(barter your socks off with them!:-))

Kitbag here is ST 120 frac, 127mm F9 frac, 254mm sct.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi IoHady.

A wise choice. I have only been doing astronomy for a short time and my first view of Jupiter was a little bit of a disapointment as it was so small, but I had no pre-concieved ideas as to how it should look out of a scope of my size. I was put straight though by the peeps on SGL. If you are expecting to see big very detailled objects like the ones on the tv and magazines then prepare to be as dissapointed as I was. However once you have realised that you can still see great things including the moons of Jupiter as well then you will be totally blown away.

With Jupiter appearing as small as it is you will need time at the eyepiece in order to tease the detail out of it.

As far as Saturn is concerned I haven't seen it with this scope yet. It will be good for viewing in a few more weeks time.

I did however look at it through a friends 40 year old reflector earlier this year. It was fuzzy, but it was unmistakably Saturn. My brother and I were in my back garden leaping around going nuts with excitement when we saw it for the first time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, thanks for that damnut. Pretty sure I'll be getting the 127 now. Thanks everybody for your help :icon_salut:

Hi, yea the Skymax 127 or the Celestron 127SLT are a great choice for Planets and Moon.

The two 'scopes are pretty much the same but I'm led to believe the mount and electronics are a bit better on the Celestron.

Whatever you choose I wish you many nights of enjoyment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Hady

I went for the Celestron Nexstar 90 SLT and I am really pleased with it, but the thing I notice most when looking at planets is how much wobble there is. From what I have read on the forums this is down to the mount, so you may want to take this into consideration, any way my tuppence worth. Hope you have great fun choosing your scope and clear skies using it.

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you go to http://www.12dstring.me.uk/fov.htm you can put in the scope make and model and eyepiece and it will give you a rough idea of what things will look like!

ive got to say, when ive tried this site i found it quite poor in true comparisons. if someone bought a telescope on the view of a galaxy on there,they will be very dissapointed i recon. sure someone who used a scope for any length of time would realise that you'd need to take most of the views with a pinch of salty optimism. but a beginer should be warned before hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.