Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Afocal moon effort


tenbyfifty

Recommended Posts

it was an amazing faff trying to get the camera to line up with the scope ep.

I gave up with the tripod and did it by hand - this was the best of about half a dozen.

Don't like using my new camera in the dark though so won't be doing this again.

afocal_moon.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so won't be doing this again

Bet you do though since your off to a good start 8) :D

what i mean is I'll get a web cam or something designed to do the job.

trouble is you don't know what you've snapped till you see it on the pc -

i was dead chuffed i got this - the rest were carp.

are cheap web cams ok for moon pix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a dozen? you're lucky. I went through about 100 pics with handheld afocal and they were all a waste of bytes.

sorry to hear that. i must have had beginner's luck.

any idea what the optimum exposure settings for the moon are btw?

the above pic is F4, 1/50 sec iso 80.

i suppose i could gone down 1 f stop and maybe increased the shutter speed

to make it less blurry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends entirely on your aperture, focal length, eyepiece focal length (for afocal) and seeing. Probably a lot of other things too. If your camera can do bracketing that might be a way forward

yes i take your point, i guess if you get one reasonable shot like this its a good starting point.

It would be good if you had some sort of cam where you could input the specs of the scope/ep and the object you were trying to image, and it did the rest - one day maybe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice shot, actually. I tried to do afocal shots of the moon when it was at half phase, but I found out that the light meter for my camera is not inside the lens, so everything was terrible overexposed. Back to the drawing board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice shot, actually. I tried to do afocal shots of the moon when it was at half phase, but I found out that the light meter for my camera is not inside the lens, so everything was terrible overexposed. Back to the drawing board.

yeah, i had a few like that.

here are the exposure settings for this pic again, probably not ideal but a good starting point for tweaking i guess:

F4, 1/50 sec iso 80.

i suppose i could gone down 1 f stop and maybe increased the shutter speed

to make it less blurry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.