Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Pixies

Members
  • Posts

    2,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Pixies

  1. 23 hours ago, Chaz2b said:

    Okay, I didn’t want any arguments on this subject, and I certainly got a lot of info, but ….and I don’t know if it’s the right decision, I bought a brand new Pentax XF zoom for half price! to use in my Celestron Regal 100. I shall let you all know tomorrow if it works for me.

    well that didn’t work out did it! The barrel on the Pentax is longer than standard barrels so won’t seat fully in, therefore it won’t focus! It fits in standard eyepiece holders and diagonals but not my spotting scopes. Lesson learnt.

    If you have the same zoom and know a workaround I’d love to hear it.

    chaz

    The Baader zoom works with the Regal spotting scopes:

    https://www.birdforum.net/threads/celestron-regal-m2-65-and-baader-hyperion-zoom-mark-iv.356352/

  2. I bought a job-lot of eyepieces which excitingly included a 12mm Delos! Around 70°-80° FOV is my sweet-spot, so I was really looking forward to using it. I've used it for several sessions now, and wanted to love it - but I don't!

    I can't say what it is - it's comfortable enough and I have no real difficulty getting my eye position correct. Perhaps it's just the faff of the adjustable body, but it doesn't really 'disappear' in use.

    So - now having tried a Delos and an Ethos (too wide for me) - should I just bite the bullet and get a 13mm Nagler? Anyone here have experience with the 12mm Delos and 13mm Nagler (T6)? How do they compare in use?

  3. First 'spring' fuzzy session tonight with the dob. managed some old favourites, starting in Leo

    2/3 of the Leo Triplet - M65 and M66 easy with direct vision but NGC 3628(Hamburger) is rarely seen from my back garden. I should try earlier in the evening, as there's some murk low down to the SSW

    2/3 of the other Leo triple. M105 and NGC 3384 were faint but just visible with direct vision. NGC 3389 was not.

    Part of the same group: M96 was just barely visible but I couldn't find M95 - just too far down in the murk.

     

    I shifted east and up, to get to darker sky - Canes Venatici:

    M51 - both lobes visible but no structure

    M63 (Sunflower) - bright centre with direct vision. Using AV, I could make our much more width, all the way out to the nearby star HD115270

    M94 - nice and bright, even visible in the finder 

    NGC 4490 (Cocoon) - main part visible with DV.

     

    By now it was -2°C and with no gloves on (duh) it was getting too cold to carry on.

     

    Nice to start seeing the old faves again. I need to hit a dark site soon.

     

    • Like 11
  4. On 11/03/2023 at 09:37, Marc1964 said:

    Just taken a look and yes would be quite high. I will lurk on this site for a bit and see what comes up in the future. Thanks for the guidance! 

    It's very good for eyepieces and smaller items. Pretty much all my LVWs and SLVs have come from here - at around £50-£80 each.

    Be aware, if a 17mm LVW ever comes up on it, I will be bidding!

     

    Note though. If you buy from a retailer on the site, or the value is significant (over £100 say) you are much more likely to end up paying import duties / VAT. I'd estimate I've been landed an extra bill from DHL about 20% of the time. If you are getting a few things and accept their offer to combine into one single parcel, it always seems to get caught.

    • Like 1
  5. Aligning the finder during the day is much easier but as you get to know your scope, you'll know whether you need to fine-tune the finder alignment each night. If that's the case, hopefully it'll only ever be a little bit off, so you can align just using a bright star.

    With a few nights' experience, you'll know what you need to do. It will depend on how you store the scope, whether you remove the finder each time, etc.

    • Like 1
  6. Here's a few I got earlier.  Please bear mind my DSLR is about 18 years old and not very good in poor light! My daughter's is much nicer, but it was out of charge!

    My neighbour's mobile phone was getting better pictures! I need to get a new phone....

    But even with the naked eye, you could see the green - and the skies here are hardly dark. It was great to see the columns suddenly reach up into the sky!

     

     

    1.JPG

    2.JPG

    3.JPG

    4.JPG

    • Like 14
  7. Having trouble polar aligning, too! Clouds though! 

    I'm next to the (north facing) coast. There's a strong northerly breeze but a high wall shelters the garden from the wind. I could see up to about 40 degrees so Polaris was hidden. I was waiting for the clouds to quickly blow over, as they are moving pretty fast. But even after 10 minutes, Polaris was still hidden! 

    The low clouds are forming as the air hits the land. So it's like a never-ending roll of clouds. I've never noticed that before!

    • Like 1
  8. Had a quick pootle around Cancer last night. the first clear night here for ages, it seemed. Seeing was average but transparency was pretty poor; the sky looking pale and washed out.

    Still - haven't had the dob out for a while and had some new (to me) eyepieces to try out.

     

    Σ 1245 - easy split at x40 - both yellow but one much brighter. 

    Tegmine (Zeta Cnc) - the tighter pair were elongated at x150 but at x240 were occasionally notched but the seeing wasn't good enough for anything better.

    Σ 1291 (57 Cnc) - Obviously notched at x240, but seeing too poor to split

    Σ 1298 (66 Cnc) - Nice easy split.  Quite a difference in brightness but nothing too tricky.

    M67 - Used this to compare the new Delos 12mm to my old Vixen LVW 13mm. The former framed it better and gave a more immersive view, but the LVW was so much more comfortable to use!

     

    Also - Iota Cnc - Very easy split with lovely looking larger gold and smaller cool blue. One of these 4 - see this really nice image and past post by  @orion25:

    image.png.b02f8d8a957ac9edab449558ef3e6913.png

     

    • Like 9
  9. this is from Televue:

    image.png.fe9f9fd65927c88bfb2335caea85eff3.png

    Exit pupil = eyepiece FL / scope focal ratio (which is 5 in your 150p)

    So you might suffer visible astigmatism in your 1 dioptre eye  with an exit pupil of 2mm or above. With your F5 scope, that'll be with 10mm eyepieces and above. With your 0.75 eye, it'll be a 3mm exit pupil - and therefore 15mm eyepieces and above.

    • Like 2
  10. Spending a few days away in a (posh)  cabin in North Yorks with the family. Of course I brought some gear, although the forecast was poor. ST80, AZgti, zoom and binos 

    Last night was good, so I did a quick tour of some highlights for my brother. There was a little high cloud, so had to dodge around a little . The sky was dark enough to see Andromeda naked-eye earlier, but it was behind the trees by the time we were out. Ticked-off:

    Double cluster

    Pleiades

    Beehive

    E3(ZTF) comet

    M81/82

    Leo Triplet

    M51 Whirlpool 

    M35/36/37

    But to be honest, he was most impressed just using the binos!

     

    • Like 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.