Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Altocumulus

Members
  • Posts

    542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Altocumulus

  1. I've had my Quark-Chromo for just over a year. There's be few really good opportunities to use it - and when I did I had my setting on zero - that is directly opposite from the light.

    The last two days have given real opportunity to look at what each of the settings gave in terms of the best band.

    Using a Starwave 102 f11 scope on my NEQ6-R, Pegasus focuser and Player One ApolloM-Max I tested the Quark.

    These are the results, from yesterday, Tuesday - which fed on from those on Monday.

    Given Tuesday showed more cirrus, than Monday (which was a full blue sky day) - I opted to start with odd settings.

    On the charts +5 is equivalent to 1 o'clock (where 12 is the light). Flats were a single set of frames based on the +5. Processed in AS3 and stack results only.

    OddSettings.thumb.png.6db76cbf7a4f389e30b5c59fe1e6ae80.png

     

    By the end of the morning cloud was beginning to bubble up and the above suggested it pointless to look at the - settings. So I looked again at the +, but this time all the individuals had their own flat attached - either by de-focus, cling film or plastic bag. Processed in AS3 and stacked results only.

    positives.thumb.png.894268cf7d9e6d328d0cfeb1eb06164c.png

     

    Final images show +5 & +4, stacked in AS3, processed further in imppg & Affinity Photo 2. Natural & inverted (using imppg inv button).

    54withinv.thumb.png.3fb04cff2a62a561446b0de742fdb56e.png

     

    If there's anything I've taken from this, flats are pertinent to the image chain - any changes need their own flat (I generally abided by this anyway) and settings on the Quark need to be tested, you can easily see that the zero position is far from optimal.

    Thanks for looking.....

    • Like 5
  2. I have a simple solution, just tested manually.

    An 1/2 inch extension tube with sct m/f thread.

    Quick test on solar just now. Not perfect focus, as slewing was manual at the time, but enough to show a motorised focuser will work, connected to the OVL Crayford. ( It works on my Skymax.)

    At 1/2 inch there's a prevention on extending the mirror screw fully outwards, but as the Mak focuses about half way in it shouldn't affect operation.

    Now to source a focuser. Probably pegasus. 

     

  3. 19 minutes ago, alex_stars said:

    Hi,

    are you still thinking about using your Mak with a remote focuser. I also have a OMC-140 deluxe and currently work on understanding its mechanics in detail.

    One suggestion I would have would be to open it up from the back and remove the micrometer screw. Then you could replace that with a fixed screw to hold the primary in place and mount your OVL Dual Speed 2" Crayford Focuser to use with no obstruction.

    Just a quick question. Why do you want to do that? Is your primary mirror focuser broken or does it have some mirror jump/flip when you focus?

    Cheers,

    Alex

    Hi Alex,

     

    Why? Because I remote view from indoors. This would require some motorised focus unit attached.

    My OVL focuser is of the correct fitting, but the position of the micrometer screw prevents it being put in place. Your suggestion of replacing the said screw with an alternative is, certainly, possible.

     

    Geoff

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.