-
Posts
648 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Now you have a permanent home for your scope and are not setting up each night, if you intend to use more than 1 scope then it makes it easier to swap over systems if you mount the control equipment off the OTA. The other advantage is that the reduction in weight should improve tracking. Downside is that a little more care needs to be taken over cable management. (There is an advantage of having everything on the OTA if you are having to cart it outside and place it on a mount and tripod each time.)
-
I actually image both native and with the reducer depending on target. That said f10 imaging will take you a long time to get enough data , especially when you dont get a lot of good clear nights. Going forward I dont see me imaging at f10 very often except on the moon. I use a 2x Powermate to image bright planets at f20. If your new to SCT , I highly recommend using an OAG not a guidescope. The Celeston OAG has a nice large prism compared to others.
-
The f2.5 primary (and so the longer OTA) has a particular benefit for this system when loaded with an OAG and ZWO camera train. I no longer need as much front counterbalance weight for the system. I was using 2kg front weight on my EdgeHD 8 to get it to balance. The Edge HD 9.25 imaging system can balance without any front weight, as long as it sits towards the rear of the Losmandy. (with metal dewshield added.) This means the overall mount load for the HD 9.25 is actually only around 1.5kg heavier than for the HD 8, even though the OTA itself is 3kg heavier. It is around 14.5Kg all in (with 2nd Losmandy on top and a telrad). (The top losmandy provides adequate front counterweight).
-
fifeskies started following Veil Nebula , EdgeHD, just how much bigger is the 9.25 inch compared to the 8 inch , NGC 2237 Rosette Nebula and 1 other
-
I am swapping over from an 8 inch EdgeHD to a 9.25 inch EdgeHD. I carefully researched to check sizes and weights, but there were few comparison photos about. Here are the 2 mid transition. 8 on the way out 9.25 on the way in. There is a big step up in overall size with the 9.25 despite it only being a little bigger on aperture.
-
I use a big linear power supply that gives plenty output to power everything and never dips voltage even with the mount slewing both motors at once. Multiple outputs, some to run dew heaters that I leave on if it's a damp cold night, (In my dome), to ensure my scope stays dry. It also runs my LED based lighting both low level marker lights and bright lights when I need them. This includes external path lights. I found mine used , they come up fairly often. Very reliable.
-
EQ6-R (on pier) works very well with an Edge HD8 SCT with OAG and large ZWO camera train. (about 14KG). Guiding is around 0.5 arcseconds on a good night. (You will probably need a 3rd counterweight) I piggyback my smaller solar imaging scope on top and that works just as well (solar uses video capture) , that takes it up to around 17.5kg. I dont try to image with the Edge while the solar gear is piggybacked.
-
A well known object NGC2237 , or more commonly called "The Rosette Nebula" Well placed above Fife in Jan 2024 , and we got a rare couple of clear nights so had the chance to collect around 90 subs of 300sec. GT81 (with 0.8 reducer) and 2600mc camera.
-
It has been a poor season so far , storm after storm ruining imaging possibilities. A few clear nights in January however allowed some time with my new 2600mc and GT81 (with 0.8 reducer). A wide-ish view of the Veil Nebula
-
Top 10 Targets to Observe for a Beginner
fifeskies replied to RJC's topic in Getting Started With Observing
Microsoft Word - Top10_NightSky_Objects.doc (rochesterskies.org) Handy beginers guide of top 10 easy objects to look at. -
I have an older AZ-EQ6 without a dedicated USB on board so use the FTDI eqmod cable. I also have a newer EQ6-R with the onboard USB , so just use that direct with a usb cable. Can't see any difference in the 2 systems , both work well.