Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

bombassa

Members
  • Content Count

    362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

149 Excellent

About bombassa

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Denmark

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Weatherpeople here says clear tonight, no moon, day off tomorrow, wife visiting father in law. It will never be more perfect. I'm ready.
  2. Oh no! 'End Of The World' time. Again.
  3. Clearly something is written across the dwarfplanet. Perhaps the spaceballs were already there? No really it's amazing nasa now gets so close after so many years.
  4. My thoughts as well. Such a scope would surely have some historical value today. But as you say - not many of us have a lorry in that age.
  5. We need a drawing perhaps
  6. Hi Congrats on your new scope. A barlow lens affect the focal length of your score. I imagine your dob has a focal lenght of 1200mm? In that case a x2 barlow makes it 2400mm. So with no barlow your 10mm eyepiece gives a magnification of 1200/10=120x If you include a x2 barlow you get 2400/10=240x Some claim that a good barlow will not degrade the image - others claim each additional piece of glass is a bad thing. I guess in the end its down to personal taste. A barlow is at least a cheap way to increase the options you have with your eyepieces. Jupiter wlll be bigger - but perhaps not better.
  7. A - Ghost in the machine. B - Your wife is messing with you. Kind regards and good luck!
  8. Walked the dog around 7:30 CET and was lucky to spot seven in about half an hour. Amazingly no clouds tonight. Best of luck to all of you.
  9. Perhaps a longshot but - dew on the secondary? Hope you find a solution and get some good views.
  10. Your solar images are amazing. My three favorite scopes haven't arrived in my life yet I think.
  11. I always wondered about the huge price difference between the 1.25" and 2" versions but if the 2" focuser is so good then it's perhaps pointless to buy the cheaper 1.25" version and replace the focuser? Regards
  12. Splitting hairs perhaps but the label doesn't really say who made the mirror. Apart from this I really like the design of this thing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.