Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Mike_S

Members
  • Posts

    330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mike_S

  1. 1 minute ago, Stu said:

    I think the one on there should be pretty good Mike, not sure it is worth the expense of upgrading. As I recall they are pretty similar to the Baader Steeltrack focusers, very nice. I think John's had a single speed one on it so more worthwhile upgrading.

    Ah right okay. Yes I was hoping I could just get a longer tube for it but not sure I can?

  2. 21 hours ago, John said:

    As above for the finder adjustment. You want the X hairs to match as closely as possible with the centre of the view through the scope, at high power if possible. Precision with this will make finding things more precise. Once aligned, the finder should generally hold it's position but you may need to check it and re-adjust from time to time.

    I found that I needed a 50mm extension tube to get my eyepieces to focus. Orion Optics supply one (I see it in your focuser) but the one I had was a bit crude so I swapped to one with a compression ring fitting.

    I've now moved to a Moonlite focuser which stands further off the scope tube so no extension tube needed.

    The Orion Optics dobs are quite a lot lighter than the Chinese alternatives. The aluminum tube of the Orion Optics saves weight and those MDF Chinese dob mounts weigh a lot !

    Are the Moonlites a straight swap John with no drilling? 

  3. Yes I’m very happy thank you :) could see Jupiter’s cloud bands a bit clearer. Will have to wait until the weekend for DSO hunting. 

    By the way two quick questions.

    the middle of the cross hair on the finder is not where I have to be to line things up, more like bottom left. Is there an adjustment or do you just live with that? My old finder never had a cross hair.

    Also, so glad I finally have a dual speed focuser after my old rack and pinion. However I need an extension tube for my 20mm eyepiece. Which one do you go for?

     

  4. 4920935F-B0E5-4114-9AFE-437A3CAE0591.thumb.jpeg.5a4fd96ccc5828de6b0f2355d80359be.jpegWell I’ve been dreaming about one of these VX12L’s but couldn’t afford one new. When one came up for sale 22 miles away I just had to snap it up 😁 1/10 wave as well apparently! (Though I can’t really interpret the test results?) Just need a right angled finder for it I think. Over the moon lol. 

    433FAB2E-89FB-4599-A366-8C310CB140B4.jpeg

    395D53D2-E010-4470-9749-DCA0D514FF68.jpeg

    • Like 23
  5. 10 minutes ago, Stu said:

    That should be enough. I guess it is not that dark at the moment so it will show up more when we get back to astro darkness. Can you get your scope somewhere darker?

    Yes my wife is going away tomorrow so i have a week on my own and can disappear during the weekend if I like. I don’t fancy driving for hours but maybe an hour or so further out. I’m on the edge of a bortle 6 so can get to a bortle 5 in 10 minutes and perhaps a 4 in half an hour. 

  6. 1 hour ago, Stu said:

    Good stuff Mike. Did you stick some power on on it? A 10" should be able to resolve stars a long way into the core, and show you the Propeller shape within it. Take some time observing and using averted vision to see what you can see.

    I just went to X 133. It was a quite faint and felt if I zoomed more it would go too dark to see. 

  7. Found my second ever DSO tonight! (First was Orions Nebula in March). M13. Followed instructions online with how to find it. It was smaller than I thought! Made up though. Now I want a bigger scope to resolve more stars in it haha. What’s the next easiest to find? It takes me about two hours to find one for the first time. 

    • Like 2
  8. 29 minutes ago, John said:

    On Friday night I was getting this type of view with my 100mm refractor at 140x:

    image.png.23d5eb091da5942dad89d8e8e2fca8eb.png

     

    On Thursday night and last night the view was not as good with the same scope. On Friday the seeing was much more settled. 

    What eyepiece John? That’s amazing. Was this when it was at its highest in the sky that night?

  9. 12 minutes ago, John said:

    The seeing last night was not as steady as it was the night before. The night before that it was really poor.

    The variable seeing conditions are what dictates what we see and the clarity with which we see it and they are a constant feature of observing in the UK.

    One of the reasons that you will see recommendations to observe a target for some time is that the conditions can be constantly changing. Observing over time gives your eye the chance to make the most of fleeting moments of good seeing which is when the detail pops out and your scope shows what it can really do. These moments are what we observe for :smiley:

    This is interesting. I dont know what causes the difference. I got lots of enthusiasm from better conditions the orher night. Observing is more of an acquired skill than I realised which makes it all the more interesting. I dont have interest in processing images so I’m glad I can get better at observing.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.