Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Sunshine

Members
  • Posts

    4,939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by Sunshine

  1. Oh my, these are wonderful and those two last ones with the giant flare separating into space WOW, its been cloudy here and i have been itching for some solar views. If I would have seen that huge flare I would have been ecstatic.

    • Thanks 1
  2. You guessed it, it has been cloudy and rainy for a week and us amateur’s can be driven to madness in such times. Enough to make me arrange my kids in a line for a family portrait! my wife is out shopping but if she saw me drag my scopes into the kitchen for a picture she would insist I have my head examined lol. This is the triple threat I have wanted for a while, a solar scope, good refractor, and a small dob…who am i kidding, i wanted a Lunt 80, a 12” obsession, and a TOA130 but there’s still time. A meagre collection compared to some here but I’m happy as a pig in the mud 🤣 this is happiness for a long while, I would love to see everyone’s family portraits.

    89ABBD91-27AF-4A52-A3DA-AEBC08B01775.jpeg

    • Like 15
  3. Hello, I haven't had the chance to reach Lunt yet But I am wondering if anyone would know why I cannot reach focus when I have it converted for night mode. This is not an issue when using it for solar but when the etalon is removed and the focuser reinstalled for night using my TV diagonal I don't have enough draw tube, regardless of which eyepiece I use, am I missing something? may others with the same scope can help. When I watch the short Lunt tutorial on how to convert, it makes no mention of extenders or any other hardware needed, it just says remove etalon and reinstall focuser then use your night diagonal, weird.

    thanks!

  4. 4 hours ago, Louis D said:

    Especially considering it must have been a one-off engineering-only prototype since the shortest production Panoptic was the 15mm before it was discontinued. 😉

    I can't imagine what the collector's value would be.  Probably not as high as any Nagler Type 3 would fetch, though. 😁

    Now that you mention, I believe it was a 14 but it could have been 15, id have to check my list history on buy and sell, now im curious. 
     

    update: you see! i am an idiot, it was a 24mm panoptic and i listed it for $165 CAD (100 pounds?) 

  5. 3 hours ago, wookie1965 said:

    What did you do to make it smoother if you don't mind. 

    H!, i found it to be very creaky when moved on either axis, it would make squeaky creaky sounds as though everything was loose and rubbed together. Closer investigation revealed it to be the main plastic pivot hubs attached to the OTA on either side, the plastic rubs the metal ota when moved. The solution was to lay the OTA flat, remove the mirror cell by removing the 6-8 small screws which hold it to the OTA then reach inside and hold the nuts that secure tue hubs to the OTA while unscrewing the screws on the hubs. When the plastic hubs come off i applied clear silicone to all the surfaces which make contact with the ota, the perimeter of the hub and the tops of the honeycomb like grid pattern of plastic within the hub. When the hubs are reinstalled there will be a thin layer of rubber silicone tp prevent squeaking, the telescope felt different and silent after that. In the image below, I highlighted the hub where i applied silicone around the perimeter (with hub removed) so that there is an anti squeak barrier between the OTA and hub. Once the hub is reinstalled there will be a bit of excess silicone squeeze out but of you run your finger around the edge it will finish nicely and invisible.

    D9FAD944-6D4A-4C35-BC34-E5DE5BC2759B.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  6. I made a stupid move a few years back, bought a mint used 14mm panoptic and didn’t really care for it in my dob back then so I sold it. That’s not the stupid part, the stupid part was I totally forgot what i paid for it and didn’t bother checking its value new and ended up selling for half of what other used ones were listed for. It’s no wonder I had several interested buyers within minutes. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  7. On 17/04/2023 at 02:42, Rusted said:

    Congratulations! :thumbsup:

    The R&P focuser is fine on these.
    Made by Feather Touch/Skylight Instruments?
    The whole telescope oozes quality.
    Clever, modular design provides multiple options.
    Though the overall weight is quite a shock.
    Lunt must be making quite a few.
    Judging by the serial numbers.

    Not sure who makes the focuser but it is buttery smooth and finely adjustable according to ones preferences. You are correct when it comes to the weight, it is heavy! for a relatively small scope, so much so that it is quite surprising, actually. It can double as a weapon should a thug ever break into my home lol, solid aluminum. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.