Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Nova2000

Members
  • Posts

    707
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nova2000

  1. 6 minutes ago, alacant said:

    Hi

    Don't forget the full moon too;) 

    We sometimes image from a city centre location and find that the CLS filter works great and allows us longer exposures than unfiltered but remember that it is light pollution dependent and we've just discovered that there's not much you can do against the moon.

    With a 10" I'd say maybe 2 minutes would be enough? The CLS may get you double that. Be prepared to experiment; you've a good while before m3 rises anyway, so practise on the open clusters. Go for as long as you can on the globular.

    Do post your results.

    Cheers and good luck.

    Thanks 😊

    I thought moon would be far away from m3 by the time it's high enough to image . Yes gotta do some experiments tomorrow.

    I've heard lp filters give a blue image ? How to process those photographs ?

     

  2. Hi everyone

    I want to use the local clubs equipment tomorrow night and I'm planning to shoot some bright open clusters(m41.47) and a globular cluster(mostly m3).

    I live in a bortle 6 area and the setup is 

    Gso 10 f4, neq6, unmodded 700d, ASI Guide scope and 120mm camera for guiding . We can guide upto 5mins easily .

    So I was wondering on how long do I expose the frames, iso etc

    I have no hopes to point at a Galaxy cause I know I won't see anything because of light pollution (I may be wrong just a guess )

    Are light pollution filters effective?

    Thank you

    Clear skies 

  3. Hey everyone,

    I was thinking of taking out the astronomy clubs equipment to do some astrophotography. A Gso 10 f4 , neq6 and my Canon 700d unmodded. A ASI Guide scope and guider

    I am thinking of either the crab nebula or M78

    I remember that the crab shows up in a 30sec test shot. M78 was not that impressive in a exposure with same settings . I can do 3mins guided exposure . I can strech it up to 5 but don't wanna risk it cause of wind .

    Will be back home by 1am or something so was planning about 2hrs of data or maybe a little more .

    M78 looks bigger in the FOV .crab is small but is unique .

    Any advice on which of the targets will be good for a 2hrs imaging session ? Don't wanna waste time on doing too many test shots .

    Thank you 😊

  4. On 08/02/2017 at 19:59, Stub Mandrel said:

    Yes, but be aware that a long journey to an 'orion class site' might prove disappointing.

    By orion class site. Do you mean a place where the orion arm can be seen? What do you feel will be the naked eyed limiting magnitude of the site? At my dark site. 20km away from a town I can see it very well. 

  5. I think this is a good place to post my question. 

    To start with I have  a eq 3 mount with ra motor drive and no polar scope. I got 3mins exposure with a 50mm lense. 

    I am thinking of using a Astele 95mm makustove for lunar, solar and hopefully some bright dso. 

    I know that f ratio is too much. 

    I may use a 150/1200 reflector. 

    Question 

    1- how can I improve the polar alignment without a polar scope 

    2- with the 150/1200 scope how much second exposure can I expect. 

    3- have I provided the necessary details? 

    Thankyou 

    Raj£$#

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.