Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

alacant

Members
  • Posts

    6,181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by alacant

  1. On 7/10/2016 at 16:26, happy-kat said:

    After cropping I like to bin

    Hi. For me it's not so much a preference, more a necessity. Unless you've a top end gaming machine with oodles of RAM, it's the only way to get stacked and processed before xmas! No but seriously, it's not just StarTools. I'm sure processing raw images takes a lot of computing power no matter what you use.

  2. EQMOD EQ6

    Hi

    I had a go at autoPEC. I took all the default values but there seems little if any improvement.
    Also, I'm not sure which file to choose. There are two:
    pec.txt
    and
    peccapture_EQMOD.txt

    The former is smooth, the latter jagged.
    These appear only under EQMOD and indicate the folder:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\EQMOD\PEC
    but in windows explorer, neither file is visible nor can be seen if looking for hidden files. They only appear in EQMOD.

    Which file should I load? Any other gotchas?
    TIA
     

  3. 2 hours ago, Scott said:

    I think you're overcomplicating things louise :) . Regardless of orientation on an eq, providing its not altered it stays the same

    Ahhgghh! I didn't see this. In one post we have orientation dependence, but now we don't.

    Sorry to be a pain. Could I go back to my clouds example? Say I take 3 exposures at 23:00. Then it clouds over. I leave everything as it is; tracking and camera orientation. The sky clears at midnight. I continue with exposure number 4. Question, is snap 4 the same orientation as snap 3?

    TIA

  4. 5 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

    Hi

    If your camera (sensor) is oriented along RA/DEC the framing won't change over time. You can check for yourself in Stellarium if you set up the framing tool with your scope and sensor data.

    Louise

    Ah, OK. So if it's not oriented RA-DEC it is gonna change. That's a good reference. Slowly getting there...

  5. On 02/04/2016 at 20:16, Uranium235 said:

    Looks bang-on now. Leave it there!

    As for exposure times, as long as you can manage really (or as long as the camera can handle without getting too much thermal noise... 5-10min each should do it).

    OK. It's been cloudless all day [1]. So, just one final check: if I leave the camera there, it's going to be that orientation all night?

    TIA

    [1] Precictions about what will happen 10 seconds into the first exposure anyone?

  6. Phew, that takes some following! My camera is still where it was. So I'm not far off if I rotate 90º to where I am and centre on 4438? This is where I get another spatial headache. Instinct tells me I should rotate 90º clockwise. But does it matter? I've 2 batteries and no mains. That gives me about an hour of trial and error. An 8Gb card gives me about 100 shots, although I suppose I wouldn't RAW for trial and error. Just thinking out loud...

  7. Hi everyone. Galaxy expert needed.

    I used a dslr which I synscan centred on m84, m86 beneath. I can see m84 and m86 in the finder. I now see m84 was a bad choice. I tried trial and error nudging and taking 10 second exposures. I tried relating what I saw through the finder to what was seen in the camera, the latter only stars. Impossible. 3 hours later, I gave up. Anyway, there's a smaller galaxy , 4438 just out of shot below m86. So, 1. I turn the camera 90º. 2. I centre on 4438 so that m84 is top right.  Question: am I heading in the right direction for the chain? Or WHY. Cheers and TIA

    m86.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.