Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_2019_sp_banner.thumb.jpg.a0ff260c05b90dead5c594e9b4ee9fd0.jpg

jrastro

Members
  • Content Count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

31 Excellent

About jrastro

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Wiltshire
  1. I have the same problem . Try using an image converter as it worked for me!
  2. Am I the only one who still hasn't got it yet?
  3. Looks like I'll have to keep the LP. Not the end of the world really as it is cropped out mostly in my reprocess. Thanks for all the advice though JR
  4. ATM I have no money for pixinsight . Are there any other methods that might be doable in gimp?
  5. Thanks! As I am a complete newbie to processing, please could you tell me how you removed the light pollution?
  6. Link to a (in my opinion) much better reprocess https://www.astrobin.com/259915/
  7. Thanks! I was on holiday near the kielder forest. Truly amazing skies...
  8. Here is my first proper go at milky way imaging using my new star adventurer. 6 x 180sec at ISO 1600. Your processing advice would be greatly appreciated as I have only done basic stretching. Thanks in advance
  9. The detail and colour captured is fantastic but maybe a tad over processed? Nice image though
  10. Read the response in full and has worked hard to reduce the negative effects of light pollution. In 2014, the Government published a policy update, ‘Artificial Light in the Environment’, highlighting the steps that have been taken to reduce artificial light pollution. The update is available to view at:www.gov.uk/government/publications/artificial-light-in-the-environment-policy-update. Defra will continue to work with other Departments to enable the impact of outdoor artificial lighting to be suitably considered in future relevant Government policy development. Street lighting in England is the responsibility of Highways England for the Strategic Road Network and the relevant local highway authority for all other public highways. Local highway authorities have a duty under the Highways Act 1980 to maintain the public highways in their charge, including street lighting where provided. It is for local highway authorities to decide on what type of technology they should introduce into their service. The Department for Transport encourages all local authorities to replace their street lighting with LED lighting where it is economically feasible to do so. New, modern luminaires can reduce the amount of glare emitted. The Department also encourages local authorities to consider best practice when making decisions about lighting on their networks. Advice is available from the UK Lighting Board and the Institute of Lighting Professionals. Artificial light from premises is recognised in the Environmental Protection Act 1990 as a potential ‘statutory nuisance’. Under this legislation, local authorities have a duty to take reasonably practicable steps to investigate complaints of “artificial light emitted from premises so as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance”. More information on statutory nuisance rules, lights that are exempt and how councils can assess light is available at:www.gov.uk/guidance/artificial-light-nuisances-how-councils-deal-with-complaints. We also recognise that artificial light is an important issue in the context of planning and sustainable development. The Department for Communities and Local Government’s (DCLG) National Planning Policy Framework includes consideration of the impact of light pollution from artificial light on local amenity, intrinsically dark landscapes and nature conservation. DCLG has also published additional guidance setting out when light pollution is relevant to planning: planningguidance.communities.gov.uk/blog/guidance/light-pollution. Light pollution can also have a disturbing effect on certain nocturnal species, particularly some bat species. However, we do not fully understand its impact on wildlife. Under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, certain species are protected from disturbance, which may, in some circumstances, include light, for example leaving the lights on in a church to deter bats. Under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, public authorities have an additional duty to have regard for conserving biodiversity when carrying out their functions. In particular, any planning application that may impact on protected species should have an ecological assessment. Any such disturbance proposed in a planning application would require an application to Natural England (in England) for a licence to allow it to happen. Further information on the management of protected species can be found at:www.gov.uk/guidance/protected-species-and-sites-how-to-review-planning-proposals. Defra is pleased to see that policies in place to protect and enhance valued landscapes are helping to reduce light pollution. Defra Ministers have supported parks that have applied to become International Dark Sky Parks or Reserves. So far, Exmoor National Park and South Downs National Park have been successfully designated International Dark Sky Reserves. The Kielder Water and Forest Park and Northumberland National Park jointly achieved the designation of Dark Sky Park, now the largest in Europe. An eight-point plan for National Parks was launched in March 2016. It mentions that dark sky parks are helping to extend the season for National Parks and that “The Government will work with National Park Authorities to make this possible”. Further information can be found at:www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-parks-8-point-plan-for-england-2016-to-2020. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs" At 100,000 signatures... At 100,000 signatures, this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament Share this petition Facebook Email Twitter Whatsapp Created byMichael Hendle Deadline22 July 2016All petitions run for 6 months Get petition data (json format) Home All petitions Start a petition How petitions work Privacy and cookies Feedback Open Government Licence All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated © Crown copyright
  11. Thanks for the idea about the eq6 tripod. Will probably use one as it is fairly cheap but VERY sturdy. My only concern is that it may not be portable enough for easy transportation.
  12. That looks a lovely tripod! However, I was wondering if it is possible to use anything cheaper (probably not as you get what you pay for).
  13. Hi guys. I am thinking of buying a SW star adventurer and am wondering if anyone can recommend a tripod to use with it. I would be using it with lenses up to 200mm in focal length. Ideally it would be as cheap as possible as I am on a tight budget. Thanks in advance
  14. How about a c11? Quite a few people on here use them and focal length is fairly long http://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/celestron-c11-xlt-optical-tube-assembly.html
  15. I couldn't see it either, despite the fact that I was using a 200mm reflector and I KNEW I was in the right place!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.