-
Posts
907 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by AbsolutelyN
-
-
This is a bit of an experiment and a bit of fun - my Esprit 80 attempting to image M42 through high cloud last night. The results were very predictably completely unusable but at least I got this little sequence out of it. Yes - my cable management is non-existent at this point - I don't know where to start on that one.
- 9
-
That's interesting, I must make the effort and take a serious look at APT. At the moment I don't want to potentially waste a (very rare) clear night trying problem solve all the things I'll almost certainly get wrong with APT.
I'm not as accurate - I set plate solving to 50px. Occasionally it fails to be that accurate but I've always put it down to my setup with cables hanging all over. It usually takes 3 or 4 attempts but is certainly accurate enough for my needs. I've never done a multi-plate image before so I can't comment on that.
-
1 minute ago, symmetal said:
Just tried it and same here. Looks like the remote image server isn't working. A similar thing happened a year or so ago when the server changed the search string format slightly leading to the same problem. SGP developers then released a program patch to fix it.
Alan
Brilliant thanks, I was thinking of un-installing and re-installing so will hold off that
-
Yes, it will bring up images it's already found for me too but nothing new. I've never known if fail before but a quick google suggests it might not be SGP but a service its using. I can't find much info on it. Platesolve itself seemed to work fine last night though.
I love SGP, its just got a nice standard windows interface, learning something like APT I find daunting mostly as the user interface seems really odd and unfamiliar. I just wish SGP would implement multi-camera dithering. It's generally stable for me. I crashed for first time during the night last week but I think it was my PC that locked up rather than SGP as it's done it a few times during the day when not using SGP.
-
Is anyone having issues with Framing and Mosaic Wizard in SGP? Could not get it working last night, still not working, not sure if I've broken something or there is a remote server that's not working causing the error. It finds the RA/DEC for searching for an object but after a long time pops-up a message "Error! Failed". Any ideas much appreciated.
- 1
-
My thought is an editor will most likely go with the best images submitted based on various factors. One might be high image quality and composition. Another might be uniqueness - just being different to usual images - or perhaps an image with a narrative or story. I had two images published back when I had only a very basic 60mm refractor and no camera at the time. I simply drew what I saw and those little sketches clearly stood out enough to be included in the gallery amongst what to me were amazing images taken with scopes I could only dream of. I guess because they were just different.
-
Get a sesto senso and your sorted
-
-
That's really handy to know thank you. It was back in Jan 2005 so long time ago. I ran down my car battery powering the mount so ended up having to jump start the car :-) Nice to see local images on here, keep the time lapses coming, they are amazing.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Ouroboros said:
Yeah, Lovely that. The galaxy almost has texture the way it stands out. Personally I think you've got the colour about right. You could make the blues slightly bluer. But I'm not so keen on the bright fluorescent blues that others prefer. I think those look unnatural. (Though what is? 🙂 )
It might look better framed along the diagonal. I made the same 'error' myself in the last M31 I did and cursed that I had.
Did you use a mono 1600 or is this the colour version? Maybe you said somewhere and I missed it.
Thank you . Completely agree about the diagonal, would make for a stronger composition. Could possibly be cropped but ideally needs the camera at the right rotation. I find getting the right angle very hit and miss and once set don't want to move it and have to re-do flats every time etc. It's taken with the mono zwo 1600mm and zwo 1.25"lrgb filters.
- 1
-
Thanks, I'd be slightly worried of unsavoury activity in the carpark. I setup in Grimwith carpark years ago. They sky was stunningly dark up there but in the middle of the night some yorkshire water guy turned up in a landrover and threatened me with the police unless I left immediately.
-
18 minutes ago, MartinB said:
Maybe a tad more blue in there????
Thank you. Yes agree on the blue lacking a bit. I struggled to get it as blue as prominent as it is here so will perhaps revisit and try to extract more blue next time.
-
I'd aim for somewhere in-between the two. If possible try to be gentle with the darks/blacks so as not to clip them.
-
This is one taken early Sept, 5.7 hours (171 x2 min exposures) with Esprit 80 and 1600mm. Reprocessed with hopefully better colour.
High res - https://www.astrobin.com/x3skzl/C/?nc=user- 22
- 1
-
Really nice. Do you people wandering around (or hanging around) there in the night or are the lights from yourself?
-
4 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:
Excellent! This is my favourite target. How dark are your skies?
Thank you. Skies here are bortle 5. I thought I'd have need much more exposure to bring out fainter nebulosity.
-
Thanks Adrian. I thought it might be an 'easy' target for last cloud free night for a while as it's so bright and familiar but the zwo1600 gets loads of micro-lensing issues on most of the bright stars and dynamic range is massive.
- 1
-
Quick one from last night, looks like clouds are now set in for while. 6.5 hours, Esprit 80, 1600mm.
Full res - https://www.astrobin.com/m9wdxp/0/
- 37
-
-
Thanks Dave - it's so very easy to go too far with saturation. After staring at it for hours find I can no longer judge it it's under or over saturated! So good to know not obviously too far either way. Yes, will add HA if we get more clear skies.
-
This is a 15.9 hour exposure of M33 taken over the last 3 days with little Esprit 80. The weather was not very cooperative, bad seeing and intermittent clouds, plus a few issues with tracking and sesto senso so all round quite pleased how this has come out given the circumstances. 478 two min exposures - approx 10 hours of luminence with 1600MM Pro. Any feedback much appreciated ... especially curious on views of more or less saturation?
https://www.astrobin.com/smounk/0/- 11
-
Thanks for the encouragement - much appreciated.
-
16.3 hours of exposure over two nights with Esprit 80 and ZWO 1600mm.
HA 10.6 hours
OIII 5.6 hours- 15
-
Thanks Carole, that's much appreciated, I'll search for that thread. Thank you!
Wasted Night's Imaging? 4k Time lapse
in Imaging - Widefield, Special Events and Comets
Posted
Yes, looks like it should fly off the mount. 7 hours compressed into 1 minute.