Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Space Cowboy

Members
  • Posts

    7,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Space Cowboy

  1. 1 hour ago, Kon said:

    I should give that a try for the colour as I usually boost the saturation and it can look a bit artificial in the end.

    Yep, I should have added I also use colour noise reduction after increasing vibrance.

    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Kon said:

    Very nice capture and you have clearly caught the south polar cap clouds as well. I like the colour balance as well.

    Thanks Kon! It was nice just to see some detail on screen after my previous couple of outings staring at mush.  

    I do like to use colour vibrance in image analyser rather than saturation to keep the colour looking natural.

    • Like 1
  3. 9 hours ago, neil phillips said:

    Quite clean though Stuart. Will need better seeing to get more detail. Welcome to the UK sabotage skies Mars club. Love the colour. 

    Thanks Neil. I thought my stock eyepiece holder was doing the sabotaging when I was getting a wonky reading from the laser collimator at the start of the night. Still got doubts about how well collimated this scope is. Good seeing would probably clear any paranoia! 

     

  4. Finally got some Mars data last night but only at 40 degrees as cloud and rain were forecast after 10pm. First outing with my new OLED laptop which made the seeing look better than it was on screen.

    6 min SER @465fps producing 137000 frames. Quality controlled in PIPP selecting best 10000 frames then 80% stacked in AS!3.

    Pretty ordinary image after all that!

    250 flextube dob+ 3x tv & ext with asi 224mc producing f18 :

    21.51ut

     

     

    1216957803_2022-11-27-2151_5-2022-11-27-2151_5-U-L-Mars_pipp_lapl5_ap16analy.png

    • Like 14
  5. 13 hours ago, geoflewis said:

    Thanks Stuart, that's very kind of you; now that I've picked myself off the floor....!!

    I guess it was that polished DP look that I was after, but I couldn't convince myself about it, they just seemed too smooth, so maybe something between is what I should try for. I asked Richard McKim, BAA Mars Section Director which he prefered and he said that he thought the sharper version had more merit from a scientific content standpoint, so I've gone with that. I will keep experimenting. Cheers.

    Scientists certainly wouldn't be interested in what I produced over the weekend as conditions have been dire here. You're producing some great detail under the circumstances Geof. Ideally we'd all want to produce sharp smooth shots but UK seeing doesn't always allow it so we have to compromise one for the other at times. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.