Astropedro

Nice looking observatory Horwig. I did look round for a used one a the time I built mine but there seemed to be nothing, especially locally. My observatory dome was built using 3 8x4 sheets of 3mm ply for the outer shell and 3 8x4 25mm ply for the arches to form the dome. This came to £180. I then spent £170 on a fibreglass kit, including grey topcoat, that I knew was more than enough for the outer skin so I assumed there would be enough to at least fibreglass some of the joints on the inside to give it extra strength. I assumed correctly. At any point where 2 pieces of wood meet on the inside, I fibreglassed the area with thin strips and used a good coat of resin. I figured if it was going to leak, this is where the problem areas would be. So far it's not showing any sign of leaking and I doubt it will. I guess another £50 covers the paint brushes, hinges, screws and nails etc that were used. So apart from my time spent, my 2.2m dome cost me arround £400. I already had most of the tongue and groove and framing timber left over from my shed and workshop build but I did spend arround another £100 on a bit more tongue and groove and some 2x2. Oh and the post brackets were £7 each of which there are 8. In my case, £550 covered the basic build. I've since added a lino floor, painted the interior dome for even more water proofing, I've sealed every point of light i could see on the bottom structure, mainly to keep water and spiders out, and I've added lights and electric to power everything. When I finally got my first decent image the other night after battling for 6 weeks or so with equipment, software and hardware, I was grinning like a child in that little observatory of mine. I took a minute to just look arround and enjoy the feeling of pure accomplishment.......then I celebrated with a can of Spanish lager. 🙂 The image wasn't great, it was only arround an hour of data as it was late due to another night of frustration with settings, but it put a massive smile on my face. I'll post below.

I'll look into some better security and insurance. 😊

Well. I finally got a window of a few hours on Thursday night last week. I had the reducer on the right way and the stars came into focus across All of the field of view, even if they were a little misshapen at the edges. Guessing I'll need to play with the spacing to get it perfect. I then spent 4 hours battling guiding and plate solving. The guiding would not calibrate. It appeared that it simply would not nudge the mount east. No matter what I did I couldn't seem to overcome this problem. Tried clearing the calibration data and flipping and eventually after the 3rd or 4th reboot, it started tracking. So then i turned my attention to the platesolving problem. Even though everything was now in focus, the asiair would not platesolve. I tried slewing to allsorts of targets........."Platesolving Failed". I eventually looked at the focal length that the asiair plus had assigned to my setup and I realised it had inputed 434mm which is 14mm over the focal length of the telescope. This must have been done when the reducer was on the wrong way round. So I erased the value and platesolved again letting asiair recalculate the focal length. In less than a second........"Plate Solving Succesful "........😊😊🤣🤣🤣😪😪 So at 1.30 in the morning with my EAF achieving good focus and the heq5 tracking reasonably well, I thought I may as well try and capture something before I call it a night and the clouds roll in. I slewed to The Pinwheel Galaxy and set the camera to take 5 x 180s exposures in Lrgb and Ha. The clouds began creating havoc half way through the red filter sub's but I had 5 of everything else except the HA so I called it a night. I was happy to be finally imaging with a fully working setup and I was loving the Asiair Plus with its simplicity and automation. It's been a long road to get to this point and I would like to thank anyone and everyone who has advised me in anyway. So the below image is M101 taken at F5.6 with The Zwo Asi 183mm. 180s exposures x5 in luminance, green and blue, 180s x 2 in red. Processed in Startools which I had never used before and found to be quite good. For less than an hours data, I'm a happy chappy......😊😊😊😊

Clouds.............😪😪😪

Thanks Elp.

So just to clarify, here's how I have it now. Reducer orientated the correct way. The other end of the reducer also has a removable adaptor that I mistook for being fixed. Took some separating! Once off I could remove the knurled adaptor and apply both to opposite ends. This then threaded onto the rotator the correct way round. Now I have the spacing as follows as correct if the knurled adaptor is part of the reducer spacing which I'm lead to believe it is. If it isn't, I will remove the 15.5mm m48 to t2 adaptor and use an adapter I've ordered and some small spacers I already have to make up the 55mm. 15.5mm m48 to t2 adaptor. 11mm t2 spacer 2mm t2 male to male adaptor 20mm filter wheel. 6.5mm to sensor. Total..........55mm if knurled adaptor is part of the 55mm, and I'll know pretty quick when imaging I guess.........then ill space without the 15.5mm m48 to t2 adapter and use the one I've ordered which will look something like this. 15.5mm knurled adaptor. 2mm m48 to t2 adaptor (arriving tomorrow....I hope 🙂) 11mm t2 spacer. 20mm filter wheel 6.5mm to camera sensor. Total.............55mm If either works..................there's a bottle of Cava in the fridge that I'm going to crack open and neck.......😊😄

Completely agree Steve. I never like asking for help as I feel that this is stuff I should just know, but after weeks of spending night after night after night trying diferent things and tweaking here and there, I had to reach out as I was getting nowhere. I think the core problem here was no instructions or diagram or even an image of the correct orientation of the reducer is provided when supplied with this scope. But believe me, if I get sharp focus tonight.....all is forgiven and I'm not looking back. 😊😊😊 Hope it works.....fingers crossed.

It might be. Going to take it off now and see. The photo shows the way it should be but that's an altair camera and the spacing will be diferent with my asi 183.

It would appear you may be right mate. Will know later tonight hopefully. Thanks. Pete

Altair Astro have got back to me this morning.........its on the wrong way round......🤣🤣 The rotator has to come off and the reducer attached directly to the focus tube. So the rotator then becomes part of the back focus. No idea what that means spacing wise with the filterwheel as well. I'll have a look shortly. Thanks again for your help guys....getting there....

No problem. I've got you. I will have 48.5mm between camera body and flattener when the adaptor arrives. I can manage 51mm at present. So thats close to your spacing. Just can't test it as its cloudy......🤔

It would seem I had arround 64mm between camera and flattener originally as I wasn't taking the adaptor that came with the reducer into account.

I've just ordered an m48 to t2 adaptor from harisons. Hopefully get it Thursday. If I've got clear skies tomorrow I'll try imaging with the 51mm (2 × 15.5mm adaptors and 20mm filterwheel) between camera and flattener and see what happens. Thanks Elp for your insights and thankyou geordie 85 and Steve too. I hope this problem goes away soon after chatting with you guys. 😊

So.....in the pic from the reducer..... Knurled bit reducing 50something mm to 48mm......15.5mm M48 to t2 adaptor.........................................................15.5mm Filter wheel....................................................................20.0mm Camera sensor................................................................6.5mm Total..........................................................................................57.5mm I'm 2mm over........😪😪 Also, please tell me that the rotator between the focuser tube and the reducer isn't part of the 55mm?

I've just put the knurled adaptor alongside the 15.5mm m48 to t2 adaptor and they're the same width. No matter how hard I try, the reducer only threads into the rotator from the one side. Another adaptor would be needed to reverse it. So at this stage I'm thinking you're right. Need to include the knurled part into the equation or swap it out for something else. It not only provides 15.5mm of spacing but also reduces the thread to m48 from a much larger size and the interior thread is too big for t2. Time to get the wallet out again......lol