Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

avtaram

Members
  • Posts

    1,446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by avtaram

  1. I've had my 12" Dob for about 7 years and my 6" Newt for about 5 years, both have been kept in the summer house, neither have been cleaned as both mirrors still look fine in fact the 6" still looks like new. The 12" mirror dews up during the winter months but the 6" has never dewed up, this probably explains why the 6" still looks like new.

    Avtar

  2. 8 minutes ago, cotterless45 said:

    That's a great scope, I spent many a happy hour with this most useful long Newtonian. Nothing wrong with optics to get such a tight split . Enjoy !

    Nick.

    I second that. It's a great scope, I've also spent many a happy hour using it to split doubles and it is amazing on the moon and planets. 

    Avtar

    • Like 1
  3. On 6 June 2019 at 15:57, avtaram said:

    image.thumb.jpeg.01038f6bc10fe3cd03cef7138d02d2a3.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.dc8115a153d88de6403817dc722e5761.jpeg

    first case contains only 1.25" eyepieces and the second 2" eyepieces. The 1.25" get a lot more scope time than the 2". When I bought the 21 Ethos I thought that would get more use in the 12" Dob  but it hasn't turned out that way, I prefer my 38 Panaview instead both in the 12" Dob and 120ED. The Ethos shows comet like stars in both scopes. I bought the Ethos second hand and it was pointed out to me by the seller that there was a little dent in the body of the eyepiece. I bought the eyepiece anyway as it was a good price. I'm thinking of sending it to Televue to see if they can do anything.

    Avtar

    It was a clear night tonight and despite a full Moon I rolled out the 12" dob to try the ethos 21 once again. I put the ethos in the focuser and tightened the 2 screws to secure it and then checked to make sure it was tight in the focuser by giving it a little twist. To my surprise the upper body of the ethos just spun round and felt loose. I took the eyepiece out of the focuser and tightened it. With the ethos back in the focuser I was delighted to see that the comet like stars were gone and showed as round dots from the centre right to the edge.

    Avtar

    • Like 3
  4. 17 hours ago, Louis D said:

    Are you using a coma corrector in the 12" Dob?  You may be seeing the coma inherent in a fast mirror if not.

    Can you refocus for the edge to a sharp focus in the 120ED to account for its inherent field curvature?  I use a TSFLAT2 field flattener in my 72ED to get nice pinpoint stars from edge to edge.

    Hi Louis, I am not using a coma corrector in the 12" Dob. I was just a little surprised to see coma with the 21 ethos especially as I don't see it when using my other TV eyepieces. I will have another try when seeing permits, at the moment theres nothing  but rain and clouds for the next few days.

    Avtar

  5. image.thumb.jpeg.01038f6bc10fe3cd03cef7138d02d2a3.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.dc8115a153d88de6403817dc722e5761.jpeg

    first case contains only 1.25" eyepieces and the second 2" eyepieces. The 1.25" get a lot more scope time than the 2". When I bought the 21 Ethos I thought that would get more use in the 12" Dob  but it hasn't turned out that way, I prefer my 38 Panaview instead both in the 12" Dob and 120ED. The Ethos shows comet like stars in both scopes. I bought the Ethos second hand and it was pointed out to me by the seller that there was a little dent in the body of the eyepiece. I bought the eyepiece anyway as it was a good price. I'm thinking of sending it to Televue to see if they can do anything.

    Avtar

    • Like 6
  6. 2 hours ago, GavStar said:

    Very interesting! I like the two sketches of the crescent. It looks like one was with a 14 inch scope and one with a 27 inch scope - is that right? Does it say what skies the sketches were made at?

    What is the key difference between the atlas and the guide?

     Just had a quick look, yes one is with a 14" at 200x with OII filter and the other with a 27" at 172x with OII filter. They say all the sketches were made under moderately dark skies.

    The Deep sky guide consists of photos and sketches of deep sky objects and the page numbers correspond to the page numbers in the Deep sky atlas.

    Avtar  

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  7. s

    1 hour ago, GavStar said:

    Very interesting! I like the two sketches of the crescent. It looks like one was with a 14 inch scope and one with a 27 inch scope - is that right? Does it say what skies the sketches were made at?

    What is the key difference between the atlas and the guide?

    I have not had a chance to look at it properly yet , I just took a few random pics with a smart phone. I will have a proper read over the next few days.

    Avtar

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.