Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

DaveS

Members
  • Posts

    10,956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by DaveS

  1. When I first moved from DSLR to CCD I went with AstroArt, version 5 at the time, and am now using version 8 SP2. I still find the stacking exceptionally good and blindingly fast. I was a long time PI refusenik until the RC AI tools came out which caused me to bite the bullet and stump up for a license. I still use AA* for some of my processing as I find the DDP stretch often gives better results that either ArcSinH or Masked Stretch though the latter is useful. The "Attenuate Single Colour" in AA8 I find very useful for its control and visualisation of the areas being attenuated, I've had a better reduction of magenta stars in SHO palette images than in anything else.

    Occasionally AA8 will throw a wobbly when trying to stack NB images (I'm still not sure why) in which case DSS will do the job.

    I have also had WBPP turn its nose up at my subs, but AA8 will do the job.

    • Like 1
  2. OK. After some experimentation I found that I had to do an initial RGB combination, then split into individual RGB components then recombine into RGB before AA8 would allow me to make the fine sub-pixel shifts needed.

    RealignedSyntheticLRGB.thumb.jpg.aa23e982aa4175d861a73d6a4d30a710.jpg

    Ignore the dark star centres, I was more interested in the overall alignment. I think it's better. This is a Synthetic LRGB 

    ETA: I've been blinking between the original and realigned LRGB and the improvement isn't marginal, not only the stars have tightened up, the galaxy structure is much better defined, even though the restacked version didn't have Unsharp Mask applied. Thanks @ollypenrice

    • Like 2
  3. Thanks Olly.

    Actually I do think there's slight misalignment. The alignment in the AstroArt 8 Trichromy routine is very much better than it used to be as it now attends to rotation and differences in scale. but a touch of manual adjustment might be in order now you've pointed it out.

    I will go back and have another look.

  4. I dunno.

    I made a Synthetic Luminance from the entire data set just calibrated with a Master Dark then used it for a Synthetic LRGB. I was able to apply a touch of Unsharp Mask at the end of the processing but not sure if it's made a great deal of difference.

    I'm going to be without my main PC for at least a week as it has to go back for investigation, probably a PSU issue, so without PI or the RC AI tools that wouldn't run on this now low spec machine.

    SyntheticLRGBSatBoostUM.thumb.png.c4641394facb5c23a8c81ebefff3c629.png

  5. Work, very much, In Progress.

    This is just 6 hours RGB captured on the 7th in 10 mins subs at Bin 2 and Drizzled during stacking. My main computer blew its power supply last night as I was shutting down so I'm on my 2011 eara 17 with AstroArt 8 but no PI. All my calibration frames are on the new computer so I had to put new ones together from the data on my NAS.

    Cropp, Gradient Reduction for the sky gradients, DDP, Richardson-Lucy Deconvolution, Selective Colour for the background, Then a light Unsharp Mask and slight Saturation Boost

    Saved as a PNG. North is up.

    RGBDDPRLSCHueSat.thumb.png.9cb587f1282d12fe0e34e3b59135a66c.png

    It needs a shed-load of Luminance as it's noisy as hell, the sky was rubbish with thin hazy cloud and a bright Moon.

    @wimvb Also captured this in his wide-field of galaxies in Pegasus.

    • Like 17
  6. I had clear sky forecast for this Friday and Saturday. Friday has already disappeared, now waiting for Saturday to do the same.

    It appears to be the norm that forecast clear nights gradually disappear but how often do you see a clear night appear out of nowhere.

  7. The first night when I moved into this house from Bortle 8 Ruislip the sky was clear, and when I went out onto my patio and looked up the milky way was glittering overhead, I reckon it's mid Bortle 3. I just stood there with a big silly grin on my face!

    • Like 4
  8. I brought the RGB into PI then gave it SPCC followed by ABE and a mild dose of BlurX and NoiseX, Most of the heavy hammer being given to the Luminance.

    After bringing the RGB back into AstroArt I gave a DDP (Which I find often gives a better result) before LRGB synthesis. A slight boost in saturation and mild Unsharp Mask followed before saving as a PNG

    LRGBSPCCABEBXNXDDPSBUM.thumb.png.4818844061278751d91086056a9cdb01.png

    I think this is as far as I can take this without a more (Better) data. I may have overcooked this as it is.

    • Like 5
  9. This is more usually imaged in conjunction with the Deer Lick group as they naturally tend to fall together in most fields of view, but I wanted to image it on its own as part of my HCG project, so...

    Putting the SX Trius 694 on the ODK 12 (For a totally bonkers 0.46"/px native) and imaging on two nights, 13th and 14th Sept 2023 collecting 6 hours Luminance in Bin 1 (Yeah, right) and 2 hours each of RGB in a slightly less daft Bin 2, all 600 sec subs at -25 deg.

    Stacking in AstroArt 8, then the Luminance given Blur X and Noise X in Pixinsight and DDP in AstroArt again (Prefered the result to either ArcSinH or Masked Stretch). RGB Drizzle Stacked (Just for the fun of it) in AstroArt before DDP and LRGB synthesis.

    RoughLRGB.thumb.png.b649694495b09c11bda2e6facfa8bf3a.png

    There are a few very dodgy subs in here which I will need to replace if I want to take this further, but it might "do" for my project.

    C&C welcome as usual.

    • Like 11
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.