Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

paul mc c

Members
  • Posts

    3,391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by paul mc c

  1. 4 minutes ago, Fegato said:

    Very nice data actually! - here's my effort with it.  I use Pixinsight, so the main thing here was using range masks to control the bright parts of the nebula while stretching the dimmer areas. Also processed starless using StarXTerminator. 

     

     

    m27 stretch.jpg

    Brilliant...I am using APP, and gimp,will give it another go.

  2. 1 hour ago, Fegato said:

    I'd be surprised if 3 minutes was too long at F/7 or F/11...   not sure which scope you were using?  ..and as Alan says, would be useful to know Gain setting.

    M27 is quite bright, but not so much that it easily blows out. However, if you try and get the outer areas to come out in stretching, the centre does tend to blow out, so careful use of masks is probably needed to achieve that. Can you post your un-processed integrated image?

    I was using the 102ed with 0.8 reducer,gain was 101.

    This is the un-processed integrated image.

    m27_half-Luminance-session_1.fits

  3. Just over 2 hours on this.....can never get it right,it always seems to bright.

    I was using 3 min subs with 533mc pro,this may be to long for this target, any ideas for sub lenghts.

    m27_half-Luminance-session_1-St.jpg

    • Like 5
  4. IMG_20230608_162050.jpg.dc1a9b04ce24162d4ec91143c5513e53.jpgSmall reflection nebula in Vulpecula, really fighting the bright nights here, but have to make the most of the clear sky.

    102ed , 533mc pro , l-enhance and Asiair.

    Around 8 hours of 180 sec subs,

     

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.