Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

michael8554

Members
  • Posts

    4,932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by michael8554

  1. I've converted many Canon DSLRs, and used to measure the sensor-to-mounting plate distance at the three Torx screws with a digital micrometer rig.

    Now I mark the screws and mounting plate, and record how many Torx "points" it takes to fully tighten each one.

    On reassembly, fully tighten, then back off the required amount.

    Michael

  2. The Altair Astro Starwave 66 ED-R is a Refractor with a focal length of 400mm.

    Measure 400mm from the doublet front element.

    That's where the scope focuses, that point does not move when you alter the focuser.

    The focuser merely moves the camera or eyepiece to that focus position.

    You may need Extensions to place your camera or eyepiece at that focus point, if the focuser runs out of range.

    Michael

  3. I've been replacing the five suspect capacitors in a Classic LX200, which requires some disassembly.

    I keep the groups of screws in separate closed boxes, but the tiny screws that hold the RA and Dec boards onto the motor are nowhere to be found.

    I remember removing them, after that it's a blank :-<

    Michael

  4. Two possibilities:

    1. You have guiding with RA and Dec errors very similar  RA = 0.33arcsecs, Dec =  0.36arcsecs.

    That should yield round stars.

    But I notice a 1 arcsec spike in RA and Dec, so what are your RA and Dec Peak errors ?

    2. Diff Flex occurs when you have good guiding figures - so the guidescope is being well guided.

    But if the guidescope is wobbling, such as due to soft-tipped screws in the guidescope rings, or a wobbly Finder used as a guidescope, or cables dragging.

    Then the imaging scope is not being guided the same as the guidescope.

    Remember your imaging camera has pixels with dimensions in um.

    A wobble less than the diameter of a human hair will elongate a star image.

    Michael

  5. "I've read that the small pixel size of the RPi HQ camera is an issue when used as a guide camera."

    It's not only the pixel size that matters.

    It's the combination of pixel size and focal length, which gives you the pixel scale.

    In this case 18.05 arcsecs/pixel.

    You'd have to go much much smaller in pixel size to get a usable pixel scale.

    Binning, if possible, would make this worse.

    A 50mm or longer guidescope focal length is required, to give a pixel scale of under 6.

    Michael

    • Like 1
  6. "out of date polarscope".

    Do you mean the tiny dated offsets don't go up to 2024 ?

    If you're doing Visual, then guesstimate how far inside the inner ring Polaris has to be for 2024, and use Kochab's Clock, or an app, for the radial position.

    Same for Imaging, but improve the PA with Drift Alignment.

    Michael

  7. Do you mean that stars are distorted in some way ?

    Not unusual at the edges of the image.

    Switching on LiveView 10x will "zoom in" on the central part of the image, where stars might be undistorted.

    The edge distortion is not unusual for camera lenses when shooting stars.

    You don't notice the distortion on the daytime images they were designed for.

    Michael

     

    • Like 1
  8. I read that the focuser has:

    "S58 Dovetail ring-clamp built into focusing tube for accepting optional T-2 / M48 / M68 and other S58 direct thread adapters to enable direct thread connection of accessories and cameras without 2" clamp"

    And the MPCC has M42 threads.

    Should be possible to screw them together ?

    Michael

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.