Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Scott

Members
  • Posts

    6,671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Scott

  1. 1 hour ago, parallaxerr said:

    I spoke to Altair Astro about the Ascent 102 and their response was "On the optics, I’m not actually sure because we use a group of companies to make them and an assembly facility and there are different grades of optics available".

    Not sure what to make of that so will have to wait for the reviews. @david_taurus83 just bought one so hopefully we'll get a first light soon.

    I'm making a beeline for them at PAS but also have the ED-R in my sights now.

    2

    Word salad. A whole lot going on but nothing of substance :)

    • Like 1
  2. 2 hours ago, Cozzy said:

    Sorry Rog; we hijacked your post a bit there.

    really hope you get it sorted sharpish  ?

     

    clear skies.

    Tim

    Don't worry too much Tim, It's an 11 year old thread. I'd hope it's sorted by now :D

     

  3. 6 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

    I hope the equipment used is given consideration as well as the final result.

    In future, I think it is important that ALL challenges make it very explicit what their target audience is in the title.

    I would like to see ones chosen specifically intended to be for beginners, or at least thought out to provide a level playing field.

    One example might be limiting sub length and/or aperture ratio.

    I think a competition for compact/bridge/phone cameras might even tempt some of the visual astronomers to the dark side or encourage those of use getting a bit more experience to slim things down a bit.

    Are you thinking what I'm thinking? It's time for common sense. The challenge of our times is to encourage more participants, so perhaps the next moves forward need to go back to basics so all you need is a strong and stable tripod.

     

    we've had 30 sec subs before. 

    • Like 1
  4. This is one of the most toxic subjects you'll find on the imaging forum. You will hear very strong technical arguments from mono users but at the end of the day it's what happens in practice that counts. I use mono coz my LP is pretty bad so I tend to shoot nb. For broadband under U.K. Skies I might be tempted to go for colour as you get all rgb with every frame. 

    Enter Olly ?

    • Like 2
  5. 23 hours ago, Davey-T said:

    Soooo I am in the process of capturing an animated GIF of Vesta, this is ongoing and started last December and will finish when I get bored waiting for clear skies.

    Will it be OK  if some of it is within the dates ?

    Dave

    nope. gotta be ALL taken within the specified time slot I'm afraid. otherwise we'd be seeing 100hrs taken last yr with an adittional 10 min sub taken within the time slot. :(

     

  6. 3 hours ago, johnrt said:

    Smashing! 5 minute subs seem a little long, I thought the whole point of these new CMOS chips was that your could take lots of very short exposures, rather than the more traditional method of 10/15 longer subs?

    Theory's great John but at the end of the day, the proof is in the puddin' and this is a very tasty pud. 1 hr imaging time! How short can we truly expect? 

     

  7. 7 minutes ago, steppenwolf said:

    I wish these hadn't landed ........ I've jumped one way (increase in focal length) but have been tempted to jump the other way (shorter focal length) for some time but there was nothing out there apart from the FSQ 85 that hit the spot and I'd already burnt my fingers with one of those!

    Darn it, it matches the FLT 98 as well .......... :unsure:

    Nah mate, go for those filters you want :D

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.