Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

haitch

Members
  • Posts

    2,052
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by haitch

  1. Amongst my arsenal is a W.O. FLT110 (just the TMB designed one) that came with the matched 1.0x Flattener however I'd like to bring it down from it's native f7 for a few snaps. As far as I can make out the suggested WO option is the PFlat 6 but I've struggled to find one and it looks like it was rather expensive when it was available new.

    Anyway, whilst I've been waiting for the right combination of time, energy and clear skies I've picked up a few FF/FRs to try out. The latest is a TV TRF2008 which came at the right price even though it may not be a good match so I shouldn't lose much if/when I pass it on.

    Now the TV says it is designed for scopes from 400-600 focal length but I was thinking surely its not the f/l of the scope that matters but f ratio? Surely any 2 scopes at, say, f7 would have the same shaped light cone? Or am I oversimplifying things?

    Teach me about optics... 🤓

  2. 16 hours ago, FLO said:

    Welcome to SGL ?

    FLO has never stocked Altair cameras but we understand they are manufactured by a company called ToupTek in China. As far as we can tell their 183c model uses the same Sony sensor as the ZWO ASI 183MC, which is a good match for the RedCat. 

    A while ago we added a calculator to our Astronomy Tools website that calculates a camera’s suitability for use with a telescope. 

    We will know more about connecting cameras when the telescope has launched. 

    HTH, 

    Steve 

    Regardless of pixel size they should probably switch to a ZWO to avoid clashing with the colour scheme ?

  3. OMG, Love this idea.

    When I can afford to dip my toes into the triplet market I will not have the experience to know whether I have bought a dud or not until I have lived with it probably too long to return it so the idea of the reassurance of an expert's examination/adjustment is very attractive!

  4. Well to my mind the darkest spot in the Walsalll Borough is probably Pelsall North Common. Brownhills Common and the Chasewater Heaths that fall into Walsall used to be ok but the A5 & the M6Toll hemming it in coupled with floodlit public buildings (especially schools and sports facilities) have pretty much ruined that

  5. Hi Steve

    Not met up with anyone of the old gang for quite a while (since we lost the access at Cosford)

    Neil, I think the urban areas are a bit far gone to worry about light pollution now unless there is some dramatic reversal in street lighting policy - even my "quiet" residential street is light up like daylight with high pressure sodium lights that have no shielding - when I complained to Walsall Council that the light outside my house was shining into my property they sent a guy out who stuck gaffer tape on the back edge of the light which did sod all good.

     

    It's probably better to focus on areas a bit further out that still have a hope in hell of surviving the ignorance of the bureaucrats.

     

    Regards

     

    Paul

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.