Gina

It used to take a couple of seconds per 32MB file but now I've timed it at 20s - ten times as long so it looks like the line has gone from gigabit to 100Mb/s. The Ethernet switch is showing gigabit though on its LEDs. 20s for 32MB means 20s for 256Mb though I think there are a couple of extra bits in the protocol. That works out at 8Mb/s so it looks like I'm getting 10Mb/s which would be right for 10bit per data byte protocol. EDIT>>> No that's not right - I'm not awake yet

Not that I know of.

Reconnected with the Ethernet link which is working, though slowly - taking an hour and a half for 250 files rather than the usual 15-30m.

Oh!!! Just checked and the WiFi download has stopped dead! Getting another problem too - it keeps saying "Access Denied" at times.

Captured all those - no problem. Downloaded the darks and now downloading the bias frames but something has gone wrong with the gigabit Ethernet on my obsy laptop - the data rate has dropped vastly to little more than I get with WiFi. I have tried rebooting but no better Checked connections and they seem fine. Very puzzling. I guess that laptop is pretty "long in the tooth" now or maybe it's finally succumbed to the cold and damp. I really need to sort out an alternative. I've been dithering too long now to return the mini PC box to Amazon for no specific reason so maybe I should have another go at getting it working. Or I guess I could try returning it as no good for what I want. TBH I don't really want to mess about trying to return it and I don't know what else to get. I ought to be able to get it working - replace Win10 with Linux for instance or dual boot. Clear night skies should be returning soon - maybe tomorrow night - so I need to sort things out. The laptop is still working for capturing images and so is the relatively slow WiFi file transfer but the loss of Ethernet speed worries me.

Decided that I might try processing the RGBHa data I collected for M31 a while back so I'm capturing bias and dark frames to match. I may capture M31 later with the 200mm f4 lens but I have a feeling that I shall be wanting to capture other DSOs in NB. No clear sky tonight so gabbing any half useful bias and dark frames is worthwhile.

I think I can work out the general process. Take the all calibrated lights and register them against a reference from one colour or register the master lights - don't know which is best. As I recall from two and a half years ago I used registration software to align the separate colours to one of them as reference then took them into Photoshop as layers ... hmmm... maybe something to look into tomorrow when I'm fresher... Meanwhile, I could calibrate more data, register and integrate into mono images. Or do something else entirely!

Been scanning the book - and... OMG!! "ma bwain hurts Bwian!!! First of all the techno-speak needs translating into English

Nor me It means either I have to try and remember how I did it in Photoshop over two years ago or get reading about PixInsight. I think I would prefer the latter as that's the way I want to go in future. My main machine is now my Linux Mint desktop which is running PixInsight whilst the Win 7 machine has been relegated to the background as a server just for things that won't run in Linux - accessed via TeamViewer. My aim is to move away from Windows.

Here's the OIII processed in the same way. 64 120s subs selected in Blink with BPP and Photoshop processing with this result.

I've been processing some data from way back in the beginning of October, of the Cygnus area widefield taken with the 28mm f3.5 lens. So far in Ha (but there's also OIII) - 160 original frames reduced to 100 by inspection in Blink. So that's 100 Ha subs of 120s with gain of 500 and temperature around -30C. There were also 25 matching darks from the time with one duff leaving 24 which I've integrated for calibration. Already had matching master bias and flat so processed in BPP saved in TIFF format and post processed in Photoshop via TeamViewer in Win 7 desktop. I'm currently capturing more 120s darks to add to the previous 24 but not sure they're needed.

This image crop gives about the same FOV as I would get with a 200mm lens and I was going to set that up for this sort of image size but with the 200mm lens being more than a stop slower I'm wondering if the 200mm lens would be such a good idea - I would need twice as much imaging time to get the same amount of data and although better resolution, do I really need such high resolution. I'm thinking deeper data might be better than higher resolution given limited imaging time.

Bit more noise reduction.

Here is the result of post processing in Photoshop.

Now post processing in Photoshop. 16bit processing is so much better - a lot of detail was lost in GIMP - but I want to do a lot more in PixInsight as I get to learn more about it - gradually making progress - slow and steady

Reprocess of Jelly Fish with matching darks. 44 subs this time (1 failed) 60s g500 -30C. I think this is a bit better Post process in GIMP - now going to transfer master image to Photoshop in my Win 7 desktop and post process in that. More powerful then GIMP and also 16 bit whereas GIMP is still only 8 bit.

Yes indeed Also, this was calibrated with the wrong darks and I'm taking matching darks right now. This was captured with a gain of 501 and the darks were 439 (nearest APT will go to 500 and 440). I'll process again once I get the new darks and see what difference there is. 6dB gain difference I would expect to make a difference but we'll see. Looks like next clear night will be Monday. Meanwhile, I have lots of unprocessed data to work on for other DSOs.

Yes indeed, I certainly will - soon as I get the chance I like to get at least 100 of these short subs. I was quite pleased how much I got with just 45m total imaging time

Sky has deteriorated now I'll capture more IC 443 data next clear night. Meanwhile, I've fed just 45 files selected in Blink through BPP and done a bit of post processing in GIMP. Here's the result - full frame and cropped the the Jelly Fish.

Neither last night's nor tonight's H&S SII masters look any good I think the combination of Ha and OIII will be as far as I will be able to go - I can't see the SII adding anything useful. I might try combining all the subs and feeding them through BPP.

Processing tonight's H&S SII subs - total 80 passed the Blink test - in BPP.

Gave up on H&S SII and decided to have a go at IC 443, Jelly Fish Nebula, in Ha. Here is a single Ha sub of 60s g500 -30C histogram stretched in GIMP. The Monkey Head Nebula is also in the frame

Capturing the Heart and Soul in SII but the data is very sparse - almost invisible in unprocessed subs but I've dragged a bit out in GIMP using curves and "despeckle" several times over

Just finished collecting darks and biases to match the SII subs of the Heart and Soul from last night and with the sky clear have swapped the lens cap for dew shield and opened the observatory roof ready for more imaging.

Been running the SII subs through Blink discarding heaps but there are some that could integrate into something useful Scanning through the stretched images you can see the clouds blowing through the images and untick the clouded out images. I've gone though the set several times moving image files to my Junk folder. The first run tailed the set for dawn onwards then discarding for clouds. I've ended up with 75 possible images to process further out of the original nearly 300. So the night may well have provided useful data from the gaps between clouds - the advantage of short exposures