Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

whatablanker

Members
  • Posts

    154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whatablanker

  1. All a bit technical for me but it's a fantastic image. Everyone's got an opinion and I appreciate that but credit where credit's due well done
  2. I haven't posted for an eternity so here's one I did Friday night the first time out since April. IC1318 and surrounding nebula in Cygnus 17 x 300sec @ ISO800 with darks, flats and bias frames Stacked in DSS processed in Startools and CS6 final noise reduction using Topaz Denoise AI.
  3. whatablanker

    David Hardy

  4. I have deleted this post as I can't download the image from flickr using the BBcode it works on the astronomyshed but not on this forum. Has some thing changed?
  5. Can anyone tell me why this doesn't display? It used to when I used this like from flickr. It also works on Astronomy Shed. [img]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51415297013_25918ccc68_k.jpg[/img]
  6. I have reworked both images. Image 1 straight from DSS to CS6 image 2 Startools then DSS and CS6
  7. Thanks guys. The image was taken with a modded camera so it does bring the reds out more
  8. 25 x 300 sec @ ISO800 with full calibration frames Image 1 is stacked in DSS and just processed in CS6 Image 2 is stacked in DSS and processed in Startools and CS6 I would be intreated to hear any views which one is better. Personally I like image 2. I couldn't get the full colour just using CS6
  9. Has anyone else had issues with the astronomyshed it doesn't appear to be working
  10. This my best image of comet C/2019 Y4 Atlas taken on 26/03/20. 12 x 150 sec @ ISO 800 stacked in DSS processed in Startools and CS6. This gave me a bit of a headache due to amount of green in the image so the colour balance isn't quite correct.
  11. 10 x 600 sec @ ISO800 Processed in Startools and CS6
  12. A new one for me 38 x 300sec @ ISO800 and 36 x 300sec @ ISO1600 Processed in Startools and CS6
  13. 8 x 300 sec @ ISO800 and 10 x 600 sec @ ISO800 Processed in Startools and CS6
  14. There is so much difference in both of these. You've come on. In leaps and bounds.
  15. I'm not sure what I can do about the stars but thanks for the comments.
  16. 28 x 300sec @ ISO800 with calibration frames Processed in Startools and CS6
  17. I haven't posted for while but managed this one. 13 x 300sec and 4 x600 @ ISO800 with calibration frames Processed in Startools and CS6
  18. I missed the trunk I just caught the tip of it but there is plenty to see. 32 x 300sec @ ISO1600 processed in Startools and CS6. It's been a while but I hope ya'll enjoy
  19. It's been a while but here is my latest. My first M31 this year 24 x 300sec @ ISO800 Stacked in DSS processed in Startools and finished in CS6
  20. Thanks David. I don't know if you have noticed on the original one there are a some strange colour issues on the stars that a few people have commented on. This was an attempt to rectify them. Thanks for the comment. The galaxies on the first one are far better I think.
  21. I have had a good play with the colour module on Startools and I hope you'd agree that this looks much better there isn't the strange star colours. I did use CS6 to finish it off. I think I have lost some detail in the arms but that is a sacrifice I have had to make to get the colour balance better.
  22. 20 x 300sec @ ISO800 Dithered with calibration frames Processed in Startools and CS6 [/url]
  23. Great look forward to it hopefully more stable than astro panel
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.