Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Beardy30

Members
  • Posts

    1,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Beardy30

  1. On 03/09/2023 at 22:07, bosun21 said:

    I would definitely go for the 127 for the extra aperture and the fact that the mirror is able to be collimated whereas the 102 can’t. Maks hold their collimation great, but you never know if you would give it a serious bang in the future requiring collimation.

    I agree as a Mak owner but go for the Bresser it’s a full 127 and good quality build IMG_1636.thumb.png.eb127d0b49e7846b9b812d3040d3d60d.pngIMG_1635.thumb.png.66d6f168ac6d78738edbc451d3a4f9ca.pngIMG_1634.thumb.png.4e2bd9d51f308a81201b2ab9303dce05.pngIMG_1633.thumb.png.ae582a8d52d6bd1f83decdd9bddb32bc.png16123C2F-CC0F-4FC4-9774-0BAC21901AFA.thumb.jpeg.d3f6908329b93f5fd3310ee80a914d12.jpeg

    IMG_1632.png

    • Like 1
  2. 12 minutes ago, LondonNeil said:

    No I meant £450 is the price of the gtix mount  AND steel tripod,  that one I think (if it is the same then mount plus tripod package 30 quid less than mount and tripod bought individually https://www.firstlightoptics.com/alt-azimuth-astronomy-mounts/sw_az-gtix_mnt_tp.html?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiA5L2tBhBTEiwAdSxJXzzSJNaxPjHAFCEActKUBkMmzxIC8ZItcDAZDq26lgpdaM1tRn72rxoC9R4QAvD_BwE ) 

    Apologies- yea this looks very good! 

  3. 1 minute ago, LondonNeil said:

    Entertaining and showed me that even in London you can get 'wow!'s

    Yea they are brilliant videos to watch and I have found them great to watch - even though I have no intention of ever doing AP unless it’s with a smart phone or the Seestar s50, I’m a visual enthusiast and newbie to EAA with my 127 Mak and 102 startravel scopes - setting small targets as I go , great advice you gave also , I agree with every word and could relate to it 

  4. 9 hours ago, LondonNeil said:

    Hi,

    I'm also a newbie astronomer and in week 2 of owning an ST120.  Yes it's got limitations but so far I'm enjoying using it!  I'm trying to take the an approach that kinda applies to most hobbies. 

    1. You're new,  don't know much,  will make mistakes, don't fret.  Reading and researching is good but as a complete novice I don't even understand  a lot of the issues let alone the answers,  so I have to dip my toe/ dive in,  try for myself,  make some mistakes.  That's fine so long as I LEARN FROM THEM! 

    2.Have fun learning. 

    3. There are many who have been in this hobby for a long while,  experienced, knowledgeable and practiced astronomers and likely equped by now with an array of the finest equipment that they know very well.  They choose wisely what to use when,  and get get views,  great photos, great experiences.  I am not in competition with them!  I did not start this trying to match them.  I can USE THEM for inspiration and advice though (thanks to astrobiscuit for getting me interested,  thanks to all the contributors here and at cloudy nights for the advice you will give me!).

    4.  Equipment is costly but mistakes need not cost a lot.   Some will cost more but lots of equipment can be bought used (I got the ota and tripod,  remote focuser,  and several quality EPs from various astrobuysell and ebay ads.... I saw a baader Hyperion go for under ⅓ its rrp on ebay last week).  If you buy carefully and  sell what doesn't suit you you'll not lose loads.   Think of the cost as a hire fee.   

    Even better if you can get to a club,  trek l talk to other members and take a look through their set up,  you'll learn about some options for free. 

    5.  Have fun.   Did I say that enough? 😉

     

    BTW OP.  I'm happy to share thoughts on the eye pieces I bought although 2 weeks in I still don't know a good view from tosh!

    I’m also a huge fan of the biscuit ! Top fella Rory 

    • Like 1
  5. I have this mount and it’s a good mount no doubt about it and it’s goto features are great- it’s capable of 5kg max I would advise you look at changing the tripod for a steel tripod for stability and consider a slightly lighter OTA perhaps the 102 as you will be potentially pushing it’s capability once you add finder, EPS etc 

    • Like 1
  6. 41 minutes ago, PeterStudz said:

    I have a NeXYZ but for me (we are all different) I found it over engineered, heavy and in practice no better than a simple, much lighter £10 adapter. Other than the moon I’ve taken smartphone snaps of…

    The Sun

    The International Space Station passing the sun

    Jupiter

    Saturn

    Mars

    Venus

    Neptune

    Uranus 

    Orion Nebula

    Various Star Clusters

    A Comet

    The Ring Nebula 

    Dumbbell Nebula

    Various Globular Clusters

    Various Galaxies

    Probably forgotten something. Basically everything that you can see at the eyepiece. I find it useful to record my observations and occasionally a bit of fun processing especially on those far too many cloudy nights. 
     

    To get an idea of what people are doing have you had a look at the “Imaging - Smartphone / Tablets” on this site…

    https://stargazerslounge.com/forum/279-imaging-smartphone-tablets/

    Thanks I will take a look 

  7. It’s a good scope I’ve had the 8se and it was superb at lunar and planetary plus great for star hopping if mounted well - the mount itself is fine for causal visual but not imaging- it’s wobbly so worth investing in a better mount and tripod 

    in terms of the scope I’d recommend the 8se over the 6se in term if you wanting a bigger leap from the 130

    • Like 1
  8. Anyone else watch the starkink train of satellites going across the moon at about 18.05pm tonight? Approx 19 of them counted ,  I saw it from here in Preston, Lancashire, fantastic to watch 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.