-
Posts
31,960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
182
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by JamesF
-
-
Same here. It was over 8C on Sunday and almost 13C yesterday after a week of mostly sub-zero temperatures (even in the daytime), and the minimum temperature overnight last night was 8.5C.
James
-
I do actually want to make a version of oacapture that's more immediately suited to all-sky photography (oacapture can probably be made to work as it is, but I wrote it primarily for planetary imaging).
James
-
That sounds like a good plan. The RPi can struggle a bit with host-powered peripherals unless it has a decent PSU. Even then I still get the occasional "low power" warning if I overdo things.
James
-
With the Altair camera does the "Actual FPS" figure get above zero?
James
-
21 hours ago, kmaslin said:
Thanks James - it can see something under lsusb as MSC, and can identify altair178c3 in message tail
But still new to raspian and can't figure out how to run oacapture - a zip file has downloaded but what now? I try to install and nothing seems to happen?
Also the libaltaircam file won't download?
That it shows up in lsusb is a good sign. Not sure where the zip file comes from though. I think the source code is the only file that's ever produced as a zip.
Not sure why you can't download the files. I wonder if it's something to do with HTTP vs. HTTPS. Can you try downloading these:
https://www.openastroproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/raspbian-10/oacapture_1.8.0-1_armhf.deb
If you already have INDI installed (for example) then you may not need the second one.
It may be that the download process will automatically prompt you to install them which is fine. Otherwise they can be installed from the current directory using the command
$ sudo dpkg -i oacapture_1.8.0-1_armhf.deb libaltaircam_1.47.17497-1_armhf.deb
(just leave the second one out if you don't need it) or you can probably install them from the file browser if that's easier (I'm a very long-term UNIX/Linux geek, so I still tend to use the command line for everything :)
James
-
I've definitely tried Altair cameras on the RPi, though not specifically the 178.
First thing is probably to check that the RPi actually sees the camera as connected. If you enter "lsusb" at the command line you should get a list of connected USB devices back. I think for the Altair 178C you should see a line containing "ID 0547:4000" if it has connected ok. The output of "dmesg | tail" immediately after plugging the camera in might prove informative, too.
If you do see that the camera is connected then perhaps it's worth installing oacapture and the Altair library (if you've not already done the latter) from here:
https://www.openastroproject.org/downloads/
to see if that works. If oacapture does work then the allsky code probably needs a closer look. If oacapture doesn't work either then I may be able to move you forward a bit.
James
-
10 minutes ago, SiriusB said:
"Baader Genuine Orthos" still £49 each.
I assume you mean classic orthos there? If they're Genuine Orthos at £49 each I think I might be buying myself another set :D
James
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, dobblob said:
I hope we can now see decreasing prices because of this or is my naivety showing?
Showing?! Sounds like it might have a big neon sign over the top saying "Get your naivety here" whilst a full marching band complete with majorettes parade around it playing "When the saints go marching in" :D
James
-
1
-
6
-
-
1 hour ago, JeremyS said:
trying to get to grips
I see what you did there :)
James
-
1
-
-
-
9 minutes ago, John said:
I'd love to be able to understand these charts !
I didn't understand it either, so I've tried to do a quick bit of research.
The lines represent different wavelengths of light, which I'm sure you've already understood. It looks to me as though the horizontal scale is a measure of the deviation from the "correct" focal length of the actual focal point of that wavelength. The vertical scale appears to be the percentage of the pupil radius at which the measurement was taken, because the position of focus of any given frequency may vary across the focal plane.
I guess ideally you want the lines to be as close together as possible over as wide a range as possible for the best image.
James
-
1
-
3
-
-
4 minutes ago, LukeSkywatcher said:
Today I received a couple of jigsaws. Each are 1000 pcs. One is astro related.
Impressive. The ISS is in orbit above Mars, the shuttle is landing on the Moon, astronauts are racing moon buggies and the Earth appears to be responsible for the hole in the middle of NGC6369 :D
At least the comet tails are pointing away from the Sun :)
James
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, johninderby said:
Hows your German?
Pretty much lacking any kind of practice since I took my O Level in 1983 unfortunately :)
James
-
2
-
-
Very similar to this one, but a little cheaper after VAT etc.?
James
-
The colour correction on the ST120 is not brilliant by the way (as you'll almost certainly know if you've used it to view the Moon, for example). I imagine you'll find that stars are a bit bloated as a result. If that's what you've got to work with however, then that's what you've got to work with, so give it a try and see how you get on.
James
-
1
-
-
Ok. From the back edge of the main tube (not the focuser adapter) to the camera sensor is about 235mm in my case, or alternatively it's about 600mm from the join between the dew shield and the lens cell. I added a 60mm (T2, I think) drawtube extension to reach focus after removing the clamp and 2" to 1.25" converter that is normally on the end of the drawtube (I think that's what's normally on the end of the drawtube -- I no longer have the stock focuser on my ST120, but I believe in that respect they're the same). My preference is to have everything screwed together rather than clamped in place by a few screws with the potential to drop out or not be square to the optical axis.
James
-
I did have my ST120 set up as a guide scope a while back, but I think I've removed the camera now. I may still be able to measure something useful. I'll nip out to the observatory and have a look.
James
-
15 hours ago, Xoc1 said:
Looks like price Increases have landed on many Skywatcher Items - I was shocked to see some have increased by over 25%
Oooh, that's a bit savage. I guess we can expect to see this sort of thing on many goods imported from that part of the world, if it hasn't already happened :(
James
-
5 minutes ago, DAVE AMENDALL said:
Like many others, I have a C11xlt permanently sited under a dome. Last night was so cold the main mirror was fogged up on inspection this morning. I don't think a dew heater would have made much difference even if it had been on all night. Any comments welcome.......Dave
No, I don't think dew heaters would have made any difference there. The problem surely has to be water vapour in the warmer air inside the OTA condensing on the mirror as it cools even further? Fans to keep exchanging the air in the OTA with ambient might help, but even then the mirror can presumably cool even further because it's facing the open sky.
James
-
Just now, kbrown said:
Another hacky way to get around the potential config clash problem might be to run the other Kstars session under a different user. That way they would have completely separate configs...
I quite like this as a possible method. More than using two virtual machines, anyhow. It makes the configuration etc. easier to copy/back up if you want to upgrade or something.
There is also a "virtual X server" application that effectively appears as a display to any applications connected to it. That might provide a way forward that doesn't mean switching between virtual consoles. Possibly it would be easier to get the virtual console method (with two different users) working first however.
James
-
6 minutes ago, kbrown said:
I did this in the beginning and didn't like it. Just painfully slow and unreliable to use.
I had a feeling that might be the case
James
-
Yeah, I don't think that anything special is required. For smaller jobs I often get a dumpy bag of 20mm "all in" ballast from the builders merchant (20mm stone down to sand, basically) and use standard cement. I can't really suggest a mix though I'm afraid. I tend to throw a dozen large shovels of ballast and half a bag of cement into the mixer and then add a bit more ballast and water until it "looks right"
James
-
4 minutes ago, fwm891 said:
Just been processing what should be a 9 panel mosaic but currently just 7 processed using APP to stitch the panels together.
Looking very nice so far, Francis :)
James
-
1
-
-
There's also Hugin: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
I've only ever used it to stitch together panels for my Stellarium background, but it worked for that.
James
-
1
-
Hello from Taunton!
in Welcome
Posted
Welcome from just down the road
James