Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

StevieDvd

Members
  • Posts

    2,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StevieDvd

  1. 34 minutes ago, Mark2022 said:

    Cheers Steve but it's no different to what I've already produced in terms of detail. I'm looking for that far  finer detail as in the very first video and trying to figure out how to achieve  it or the fine detail which Kon manages to achieve with his 8 inch Dob.

    Sorry I mistook the tif files for your processed results and looked for a Mac solution in software I have used. The tweak's can be done in Siril and have some planetary processing videos on you tube that you could follow.

     

    • Like 1
  2. I'd literally just finsihed watching that video. Was trying to see if there was a levelling routinethat would prevent the end user setting it up in eq mode.  Not sure if the Dwarf had a firmware change to allow users to do their own 'EQ' thing. I was not seriously suggesting that ZWO would do an eq wedge as we all know that PA is a drawback for the first time user wanting a turn on & get result product.

    Well done for getting the thread back on track guys 🙂

     

    • Like 1
  3. Yes the ZWO only gear is a bane but that's more the Asiair than the AM5. It's probably based on the Apple Mac concept of user our hardware and we don't have to support every other brand combination/drivers etc.

    The PA for me with the AM5/Asiair is a dream come true, so easy & quick to do.

    Yes, annoying the weights bar is not included given the price of the AM5, but then again a lot of setups won't need weights at all (one od the plus points of a harmonic drive mount).

    Welcome to the club and good luck imaging with the new setup it should be easier & more fun.

     

  4. 45 minutes ago, Olli said:

    Thanks for the help. My phone won’t even connect to the mounts Wi-Fi now so something is definitely wrong as it’s showing a different ssid. I think I am just going to leave it for now as it’s driving me loopy. Thanks again.

    You've probably got the same issue as others got to, including me. Have you got a wifi name like ESP*** instead. If so then the solution here is what I and others did.

  5. I did not see a mention that you have the Synscan app loaded on your computer.  It may be that the firmware software updater needs some of the files that are installed with the Synscan app for connectivity. I had that as the first point in an older thread which helped a few others with their upgrades.

    I managed to hit the  failed update which changed the wifi name back to a factory default, but it is still possible to reflash the firmware even in that dire circumstance. I understand that SW have that catered for now in the latest loader version.  I'd been trying the update right next to my network hub and it only worked for me when I moved away from that - though I bought a usb/serial cable as a backup anyway.

     

     

  6. If you open the Ports section in the devices manager do you see a COM1 port? If another number is present uncheck the automatic port on the firmware panel and enter the port number manually.

    If there are no ports it may be that you don't have the driver for the USB serial cable and it's flagged in the other devices as not working.

    The other solutins that others have mentioned in the past is that the home network wifi drowns out the synscan so to try the update away from your home network if possible (via a laptop in garage or garden shed for example).

     

    • Thanks 1
  7. What a lot of people forget to add in to their price guestimates is the post sales support that Celestron & the app authors have to provide. Several members here have had issues with phones on the compatability list who can attest to this. So it's not the same as the Celestron Nexyz phone holders which are hardware only which go for £50 or more and share a modular design with the Starsense to reduce costs.

     

    • Like 2
  8. 6 minutes ago, Elp said:

    You'd think if they sold them standalone they'd sell far more. I'm still trying to persevere with Skeye as an alternative, there's also a camera plate solving version. My phone mount was easy enough to make.

    If you were Celestron would you sell them standalone if that earned less than selling complete scope/starsense sets? They've most likely worked out what's best for them!

    • Like 1
  9. Really like the idea of the side attachment. In my head I had the side connection being an attachment under the bottom of the base holder but your design is better imo.  I mentioned modular before as  had not realised the side mount you made was a modular one - I thought the side mount findershoe was part of the print and not an bolt-on.

     

     

     

     

  10. Would I have preferred to buy the app & mount alone? Yes, of course and I too would like it to have been £25 for both, and I guess other scope manufacturers would like as well.

    But let's be honest here, the app is written for Celestron by Simulation Curriculum Corp and includes a star catalog, plate-solvings and other features from their Sky Safari app which alone sell for £20 plus and don't need a phone mount.

    I'm sure Celestron have looked at the options for the Starsense Explorer mount/app and have decided that selling as part of a product pack gives them a better return.  They have a similar phone holder mount that can get sales figures on (that sells for around £50) which does not include an app. Similar comments have been made at CN forum and sent to Celestron who rejected the sale of stand alone units being viable for their business model.

    However, what I really wanted to post was that I think I found an issue and a solution for it that might help others.

    I was using the Starsense without a problem until I zoomed in on an area and set a new target. The unit kept trying to find the position and seemed to be in a loop. As platesolving uses settings like fov I realised that a zoomed in image might not plate-solve. I zoomed out a bit and the plate-solve worked and the position was found and directions displayed on screen.

     

     

    • Like 3
  11. If you are using an ethernet cable then you are connecting the Asiair to your 'home' network, but you have not said how you are connecting the AM5.

    Is it via a USB cable between them?

    Or are you connecting the AM5 to the same home network?

    With wired/wireless connections your network address allocations can change the last part unless it's reserved for that connection.

    Perhaps a safer solution is a direct ethernet to the Asiair and a USB between the AM5 & Asiair.

     

     

     

     

     

  12. First thing I'd do is to get a rough focus during the day, on a distant landmark, aerial etc.  Use ASIStudio (or SharpCap if you have it) and of course for daytime use very short exposures.

    Next step is to try the same at night but on a reasonable target (the moon perhaps).

    For the mount you'll need a polar alignment method to get a reasonable unguided image - later you might consider a guide scope/software.  Polar alignment is down to your preferences, either manula or software/hardware assisted. If you have a good North view then the paid for add on in Sharpcap may be suitable. The free ones that come with other software can be daunting as part of a full astro package.

    Steve

     

     

     

  13. What software are you using for the design?

    Have you considered a more modular design, where the cradle/holster stays the same but different connectors bolt on the base for a standard finder shoe, left/right side connection etc?

    With a securing bolt either side (only one used depending on the side fitting) with the 'proper bo' brass inserts too.😉

     

     

  14. The skies were not crystal clear or dark enough to merit going out earlier so decided to wait till midnight and have a look at the moon when it came over the house behind us.  As well as visual I attempted a few image captures but on a manual mount at the magnification it was moving in the view too fast for a decent number of frames to record.

    So I switched to viewing Saturn and running through the magnification of my Svbony zoom.  I got to see probably my best visual of Saturn and that was all done on a manual  AZ (Altair Sabre) so quite chuffed to locate it without IT support.  Feeling good about that I went for Jupiter as well and again probably my best visual of that too. I think I timed it well as I saw one of the moons just disappearing behind Jupiter as well as the other moons in the same view.

    This was all on my Lyra 102/1000 refractor that I'd made a mess of cleaning the optics but which Es Reid did a marvellous job doing it properly.

    I've yet to check the moon captures on my laptop but don't expect much worth posting the planets made up for that.

    Edit

    Stacked video not too bad.

    Stacked moon

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.