mindburner Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 hi being new to dobsonians, I have read a few posts that describe issues along the lines of:"just the usual newtonian coma and diffraction spikes"is this just something that one has to accept and do you recon that the skyliner 300 dob will just be the same.This is maybe a 'doh' question but it's just I didn't realise there may be a different view from that I was used to with a MAK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Diffraction spikes sort of come with newtonian terratory as does coma. The spikes are not too intrusive and you sort of get used to them, I even quite like them - and it's only on really bright stars. You probably won't notice coma unless you invest in really expensive wide field eyepieces - in lower cost eyepieces the astigmatism of the eyepiece masks the coma !.Neither are showstopping issues of course - otherwise newts / dobs would not be as popular as they are !. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perrin6 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Don't worry mindburner, you'll be too busy going 'ooh' and 'ahh' at all the wonderful views a 12inch can show you, to be bothered by coma & diffraction spikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perrin6 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Sights I recommend you check out first with your 12inch :-M81 & M82 galaxies, M82 looks amazingly detailed, in Ursa majorJupiter under good seeingThe moon is gonna 'knock your socks off'NGC 2392 The eskimo nebula in GeminiM42 in Orion of course.M64 the 'Blackeye' galaxy in Coma BerenicesNGC 4565 a beautiful edge-on spiral in C.BerenicesM35 & the more distant open cluster 'next' to itM3 - a magnificent globular in Canes VenaticiAfter looking at them you will have forgotten about diffraction spikes entirely ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acey Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Spikes potentially mean less contrast on planets (every spot on the planet's disc is smeared out into spikes across the surface). I moved from an 8" Orion dob to a 12" SkyWatcher and the first thing that struck me was that the diffraction spikes were more intrusive in the 12", leading to poorer planetary contrast. I found this to be due in part to greater scattered light in the SkyWatcher and dealt with it by baffling.http://stargazerslounge.com/equipment-discussion/99482-improving-flextube-contrast.htmlSpikes can be removed completely by using a curved-vane spider, though this doesn't actually eliminate diffraction (and reduction of contrast). But even with spikes, a Newtonian can give very good contrast - I'm certainly happy enough with my SkyWatcher now.There are of course those who think spikes around stars are very pretty and part of the appeal. The spikes can even be useful in the case of splitting very close double stars, since by throwing light out into spikes, the star's diffraction disc is made smaller.Since my real business is looking at faint fuzzies, it doesn't matter too much to me either way. As for coma, I've never noticed it: I'm too busy looking at what's at the centre of field, not the edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NGC 1502 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 As for coma, I've never noticed it: I'm too busy looking at what's at the centre of field, not the edge.Same for me Ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mindburner Posted January 27, 2011 Author Share Posted January 27, 2011 Sights I recommend you check out first with your 12inch :-M81 & M82 galaxies, M82 looks amazingly detailed, in Ursa majorJupiter under good seeingThe moon is gonna 'knock your socks off'NGC 2392 The eskimo nebula in GeminiM42 in Orion of course.M64 the 'Blackeye' galaxy in Coma BerenicesNGC 4565 a beautiful edge-on spiral in C.BerenicesM35 & the more distant open cluster 'next' to itM3 - a magnificent globular in Canes VenaticiAfter looking at them you will have forgotten about diffraction spikes entirely !many thanks for the geat response. Basically im just worrying as I am about to splash the cash. Also fancied the reviews of the 180 MAK, so just wated to get the decision right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mindburner Posted January 27, 2011 Author Share Posted January 27, 2011 Spikes potentially mean less contrast on planets (every spot on the planet's disc is smeared out into spikes across the surface). I moved from an 8" Orion dob to a 12" SkyWatcher and the first thing that struck me was that the diffraction spikes were more intrusive in the 12", leading to poorer planetary contrast. I found this to be due in part to greater scattered light in the SkyWatcher and dealt with it by baffling.http://stargazerslounge.com/equipment-discussion/99482-improving-flextube-contrast.htmlSpikes can be removed completely by using a curved-vane spider, though this doesn't actually eliminate diffraction (and reduction of contrast). But even with spikes, a Newtonian can give very good contrast - I'm certainly happy enough with my SkyWatcher now.There are of course those who think spikes around stars are very pretty and part of the appeal. The spikes can even be useful in the case of splitting very close double stars, since by throwing light out into spikes, the star's diffraction disc is made smaller.Since my real business is looking at faint fuzzies, it doesn't matter too much to me either way. As for coma, I've never noticed it: I'm too busy looking at what's at the centre of field, not the edge.That has set my mind at ease. I had a look through your post on removing the scattered light and found it very interesting and creative. It's defianately something I would attempt once I have got a bit more used to the scope in operation.thanks:icon_salut: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mindburner Posted January 27, 2011 Author Share Posted January 27, 2011 Diffraction spikes sort of come with newtonian terratory as does coma. The spikes are not too intrusive and you sort of get used to them, I even quite like them - and it's only on really bright stars. You probably won't notice coma unless you invest in really expensive wide field eyepieces - in lower cost eyepieces the astigmatism of the eyepiece masks the coma !.Neither are showstopping issues of course - otherwise newts / dobs would not be as popular as they are !.Thats great. I just had visions of jupiter looking like a cross hairs, with search lights coming out:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.