Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Waiting for T CrB aka the Blaze star


Recommended Posts

The News:

today there is no news,
again !
It remains stubbornly at about m10.5 +/- , see in pic below two comparison magnitudes taken from the   BAA chart. 

But there is a little anecdote - After much rain and cloud during yesterday evening the forecast for midnight and later was promising.
Lo! just before midnight I could see, through patchy cloud and thin haze, Vega high above and Arcturus in the west just about to descend into some trees. Not much else could be seen but ever hopeful I began setting up tripod and camera. When I next glanced up, a few more stars could be seen and about where CrB should be, to the left of Arcturus I could see two stars.
Wot ! Heart nearly stops, cloud tries to ruin things, and a moment later a star moves out of the cloud and continues to climb slowly towards the zenith !


 edit later DSLR static (not tracked)  on a tripod,
Canon 60d +135mm lens @f2.8
400x2sec subs stacked in DSS + pp in Gimp
(10x 2sec is ok to show TCrB in the noise but, 400 makes it nicer !)
 

Ad.thumb.jpg.758d0343432032a9ced74d3470d9fddd.jpg

 

Edited by MalcolmP
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel silly asking this, but is it literally just a case of compare the brightness of it to the brightness of a star with static brightness to determine it's magnitude?

Also, that's an interesting double just to the left.  Wonder if it is visible visually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ratlet said:

I feel silly asking this, but is it literally just a case of compare the brightness of it to the brightness of a star with static brightness to determine it's magnitude?

Also, that's an interesting double just to the left.  Wonder if it is visible visually.

For visual observing, Yes that’s pretty much it. One technique is to find a comparison star slightly brighter and another slightly fainter, then estimate how far T is between.

For images, you need photometry software to extract the photometry.

Edited by JeremyS
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot to include details of the pic. :-
DSLR static (not tracked)  on a tripod,
Canon 60d +135mm lens @f2.8
400x2sec subs stacked in DSS + pp in Gimp
(10x 2sec is ok to show TCrB in the noise but, 400 makes it nicer !)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Ratlet said:

 that's an interesting double just to the left.  Wonder if it is visible visually.


Using angle measure in Stellarium they are 40.5" apart, un-named m10.55 & m10.85
Using ASTAP to interrogate Simbad gives BD cat numbers for them @ m10.6 & m10.9 :-->

 

d.jpg.bfa8c1fdab0dc0055f5c3b6c2170b9ad.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and we have another clear sky, , , with no news !

Hot off the camera just now, a single 2sec sub @ 11pmBST, fetched out of the noise by the clever ASTAP , shows it still at m10 or less :(

 

H.thumb.jpg.fa3395afff56e4d032e86a6ebd0769ab.jpg

 

Edited by MalcolmP
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.