Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Abell31: The Moon Jelly Nebula


Seti Astro

Recommended Posts

Abell 31 (SH2-290), what I am calling The Moon Jelly Nebula, is a very dim Planetary Nebula in Cancer.

Even with 32hrs of integration time it was a lot of effort to pull it out nicely from the background.  Ha was the strongest, and the core full of OIII was well visible.  SII on the other hand was almost nonexistent!  Abell31 is described as "ancient" but didn't find more on the age and lies around 2000 lightyears away.  It being so old is why it is sooo dim as all the gases are dispersing and very far from the central white dwarf now greatly reducing the gasses ionization.

In the surrounding starfield there is a handful galaxies and a lot of the discovered by GAIA and are very dim and faint.  There is no distance data to any of the GAIA galaxies I could find either.  The other interesting item is a very close double star HD76037A&B, they are just shy of 300 lightyears away and only 9 arcsec apart.  Although I couldn't find if they are true binaries or not, their parallax would suggest they probably are: 10.9939 and 11.0133 milli-arcsecs which is 296.01lyrs and 296.5lyrs away.

Link to Astrobin: https://astrob.in/8ktleh/0/

Link to a video I made on this image: https://youtu.be/wxrax_QcQS4

Comments always appreciated!

SHOCrop.thumb.jpg.bb28b115a1ab69a00723e98c45b208df.jpg

 

Moon Jelly VS Ha Channel

Moon-jellies-gallery.thumb.jpg.ac74be8deed3e7f6f773758fa8cf9a58.jpg

 

HD76037A&B

HD76037AB.jpg.89cb41897267f3311aa6b0b224aed770.jpgbinary.jpg.8223f9fd27505c48a0177119fad69200.jpg

 

GAIA Galaxies

gaia.thumb.jpg.36ceffc68592e021534966fd8869c267.jpg

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you’ve really pulled that one out. I captured nearly 15 hours on sh2-290 last year and it was still a noisy mess. I intend to resume this year (when the clouds and Moon clear off) but seeing that total time is a daunting prospect.

Well done! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that I’m OSC rather than mono, I’ll be skipping SII anyway! Saying that, I have been thinking about buying an SII/OIII dual so I’ll know not to use it here, so thanks for the tip 😃

I suspect my sub lengths weren’t long enough too, seeing as you were using 900s frames so that might be part of it.

Anyway, once again, great image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.