Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Jupiter Io Shadow transit, 1st Feb 2024


lukebl

Recommended Posts

Here's a quick capture from this evening showing Jupiter's moon Io and its shadow, along with the Great Red Spot (nowadays it's more like the shrinking beige spot!) appearing lower left.

250mm f/4.8 Newtonian, 5x Televue Powermate, ZWO ASI120mc cam. c 5000 frames @ c.50 fps, 17ms exposures.

53502890311_88d7eebe90_z.jpg

I'm not happy at all with the image.

For some reason, when processed in Autostakkert the image shows some horrible artifacts making it look like it's made with oil brush strokes.  I've managed to reduce it in Photoshop but at the cost of loss of definition. I used the same setup with previous apparitions of Jupiter and Mars and got excellent results, so I've no idea what's gone wrong. Any suggestions as to what's gone wrong would be welcome. I'm using the latest version of Autostakkert and capture with Firecapture..

This is an image before softening in Photoshop:

53503039893_3ebbdee902_z.jpg

Here's a detail showing the artifacts:

53503273389_3613b423a3_z.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great composition but I see what you mean about the artifacts. Have you tried pre-processing with PIPP before using Autostakkert? I've no idea if it would make any difference but it's free to try and reasonably easy to use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you try with the older as!3?  It seems to be something with the box size at the neb, you have a square artefact. You also seem to have a lot of noise from wavelets too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kon said:

Did you try with the older as!3?  It seems to be something with the box size at the neb, you have a square artefact. You also seem to have a lot of noise from wavelets too.

Thanks for the input.

I had a go at capturing Jupiter last night using Sharpcap instead of Firecapture. Conditions were pretty poor with bad seeing and the results weren’t good. However, I seemed to be able to get shorter exposures and a higher frame rate with Sharpcap, and the initial results don’t seem to show those artefacts. 

So it might just be the capture software that’s a problem. I’ll try again when conditions are good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could also try the free ASI Studio capture software. It's quite basic but I've used it successfully on a low powered laptop where other software gave me trouble.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looks like excessive noise from too much wavelet sharpening to me. I also use Sharpcap and AS4. The only time I've seen this appearing is when I increased the wavelets far too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.