Ronclarke Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I used to Bin 2x2 with my OSC because my old laptop could not cope with the size of1x1 binning and was happy with the results (mostly!). I now have a new, more powerful laptop which can cope with 1x1 binning what difference will this make to the images? and do my Flats and Dark Flats have to be binned 1x1 as well? Thanks Ron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael8554 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The 150PDS and 183c Pro give 0.66arcsecs/pixel, perhaps a tad over sampled ? So Binning to 1.32arcsec/pixel might be better for UK Seeing conditions. Michael 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, michael8554 said: The 150PDS and 183c Pro give 0.66arcsecs/pixel, perhaps a tad over sampled ? So Binning to 1.32arcsec/pixel might be better for UK Seeing conditions. Michael More than a tad, I think. Massively oversampled anywhere with those optics. I found 0.66"PP oversampled using a 14" ODK at a guide RMS of 0.3 arcsecs. What is your guide RMS in arcsecs, Ron? A good EQ6 runs about 0.5" and that will support an image scale of about 1"PP, so nowhere near 0.66"PP. Darks do need to be the same as lights but flats could be resampled upwards to their unbinned equivalent. I'd shoot new ones, though. Except that I'd stick with the binning... Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronclarke Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 Thanks for that Olly, seems a long time since I visited you!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, Ronclarke said: Thanks for that Olly, seems a long time since I visited you!! Indeed so! Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONIKKINEN Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 There is another option to binning that also reduces sampling rate by a factor of 2 with OSC cameras, the CFA split method of handling data. With CFA splitting you split each raw calibrated but not debayered sub into their 4 source channels: 1 red channel, 2 green channels and 1 blue channel (for normal RGGB/GRBG bayer matrix cameras - almost all of them). This way you reduce the load when stacking to only 1/4th of RGB stacking for the red and blue channels, and half for green. The total time required to stack stays the same since you will be doing 3 stacks to get a composited RGB image, but if your PC is struggling and you are going to be binning x2 anyway then this might be a worthwhile option. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now