Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Dithering by hand - unguided EQ3-2 mount with RA clock drive


KevinPSJ

Recommended Posts

I struggled with processing my DSLR shots for a long while - could not eliminate noise despite taking plenty of dark frames. Looking on-line here and other forums it seems the recommended approach to reducing noise (walking noise especially) is using dithering. Unfortunately I don't have a goto mount - just RA clock drive. It seemed like this technique was out of my reach.

Both necessity is the mother of invention as they say so I thought I'd at least try and see if it's possible to dither manually. Turns out it's hard but not impossible. My routine now involves setting up a sequence of lights in Backyard EOS - usually something like 30x40s for prime focus work with my Skywatcher 150P and Canon DSLR 600D. Then once the sequence starts, I suspend every 4-5 subs and put my eye to the finderscope and my hand on the dec slow motion or the RA control. Carefully I nudge the scope so the stars move by a very small amount - first north, then next time west then east then south and so on. It's tricky if you are pointing at a patch of sky with only a few dim stars in the finder scope view but I'm getting better with practice. It is easier with a wider field of view - last 2 sessions I used a Takumar 200mm f/4 and it was almost easy compared with the prime focus sessions.

The main benefits are (a) I don't "waste" time taking a lot of darks and (b) satellite trails completly disappear. The downsides are (a) need to stay at the scope the whole time - no opportunity to go inside while the sequence is running and (b) lots more time squinting through the finderscope and hoping I didn't nudge too far

If you look at my gallery then all of my recent images were taken without any darks. There're not amazing by any stretch but I feel like I'm getting consistently better signal to  noise from the end product and I've eliminated the streakiness and walking noise issues from earlier images I've taken.

 

Compare: 30 x 30s subs @ ISO800 (with 10 x 30s darks) and Canon 600D at prime focus

image.thumb.png.a8db5b63e51c7f0a73f9cb6b6962652a.png

with 15 x 60s subs at 800 ISO and no darks but with dithering 

image.thumb.png.6e0dd3e7daa63f96b749ee0723e7df0a.png

 

Little bit tricky to find a target I can directly compare - there are sort of similar subjects but with different focal lengths.

I'll definitely be trying the Pleiades later in the year as I've not managed to get a good image of it yet that isn't spoiled by too much noise

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.