Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Widefield Thor`s Helmet.


simmo39

Recommended Posts

This is my first proper test of the Askar 400 with the dedicated FR. The moon was a bit of a pain and the target being so low and between next doors house and garage didnt help. This is 55 x 240s subs taken over 2 nights. Taken with my ASI 2600mc through my Optolong Enhance filter. One problem I had was that the red channel gave some strange blown out bits on the Nebula, not sure that was the moon or just to long an exposure but it was a pain to remove. Had to use a lot of coats of Topaz Denoise and I may have overdone it but as a test of the FR im pleased with the field of view and that the stars at the edge dont look to bad.

51940183148_ac3790fa8e_b.jpg

and the crop

51940181513_34df637125_b.jpg

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Askar 400 club, growing by the day. Ive also got the dedicated reducer/flattener and it works well with smaller sensors like my ASI183, but the corners arent so good with a full frame camera. As you have shown, it works well with an APSc sensor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, juno16 said:

Very nice image. Stars look good too!

Thank you, I think I could do with reducing the amount of stars.

 

7 hours ago, CCD Imager said:

Welcome to the Askar 400 club, growing by the day. Ive also got the dedicated reducer/flattener and it works well with smaller sensors like my ASI183, but the corners arent so good with a full frame camera. As you have shown, it works well with an APSc sensor.

Hi, Im impressed with how the stars are good at the corners. Had to crop a very little bit due to the dither but luv the wide field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ollypenrice said:

Lots to enjoy but the hotspots on the nebula are a mystery...

Olly

Thanks Olly, Not sure how they come about. On my first nights data I could see them forming but when I added the second night it looked like i had clipped the red data, I was wondering if its a thing with the filter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Admiral said:

May I ask, did you find that the back focus needed was the recommended 55mm? One day I'll get to try mine out!

Ian

Hi, I just stuck with the 55mm ( used spacer and filter tray to get 55mm ). I could fine tune a bit more but I dont think its worth the trouble as after dithering I crop a little off the image and that gets rid of the worst stars.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.