Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

is my c8 edge hd best suited to planetary or dso


Recommended Posts

Hi all any comments on the above please ,my present scope is a ts optics 580mm with 0.7 reducer giving approx 406mm .Now ive just realised that i need the bigger focal length for my remaining dso targets,but never really used my c8 ,whats your thoughts please,or is there something more suited cheers iwols  ps always said once i get original set up spot on i would never alter it ,ive  permanent mount by the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A C8 on an HEQ5 is going to be very near it's limits (still struggling with this myself - using the 0.7 reducer) It's doable but difficult - a heavy breeze is enough to give 2 or 3 arc sec spike in guiding.

You are looking at 0.65 " / pixel or about 0.9 with the reducer.

Just realized you have a CCD so you could bin 2x2 to give 1.31 which should be ok for the UK.

image.thumb.png.fc94396c8dbb0e01efcd5c0785711cf3.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say it is equally suited for both types of targets.

If used mindfully and within its limits - it will give you great results on both.

What do you want to use it for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

I would say it is equally suited for both types of targets.

If used mindfully and within its limits - it will give you great results on both.

What do you want to use it for?

dso,galaxies,nebula 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iwols said:

dso,galaxies,nebula 

I think that it will be excellent in that role. According to Celestron - it is well corrected scope across large field.

Put x0.7 reducer designed for EdgeHD scopes and you'll have nice 1400mm of focal length with 8" scope.

Pair it with larger sensor - up to APS-C size and aim for about 1.2-1.4"/px (bin if needed - either in hardware with CCD sensor or in software with CMOS) and you'll get very potent imaging system.

I have something very similar - RC8" with 1600mm of focal length and ASI1600 and I'm happy with that setup.

EdgeHD8 should have similar performance.

Consider guiding with OAG.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

I think that it will be excellent in that role. According to Celestron - it is well corrected scope across large field.

Put x0.7 reducer designed for EdgeHD scopes and you'll have nice 1400mm of focal length with 8" scope.

Pair it with larger sensor - up to APS-C size and aim for about 1.2-1.4"/px (bin if needed - either in hardware with CCD sensor or in software with CMOS) and you'll get very potent imaging system.

I have something very similar - RC8" with 1600mm of focal length and ASI1600 and I'm happy with that setup.

EdgeHD8 should have similar performance.

Consider guiding with OAG.

 

thanks do you have any uncropped examples please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iwols said:

thanks do you have any uncropped examples please

I don't have much as I wasn't able to use it for quite some time (and that will hopefully change in summer / autumn this year) - but here are some examples:

image.thumb.png.f277c92be809d49e84d3b8ccc4f8f619.png

Screenshot_1.thumb.jpg.526aa6511f98acfb02609bb15702db5f.jpg

Screenshot_3.thumb.jpg.f989f3e9eae599d0a48b52c8b3be7b7e.jpg

Screenshot_2.thumb.jpg.1a85d88a6944b4ed6cc6e80d29f96c8a.jpg

Screenshot_4.thumb.jpg.174b367d69820fd70e5012e4233495ac.jpg

Screenshot_5.thumb.jpg.e742458c66aa75faf8f578b7234b308c.jpg

Most of these are just luminance (or UHC filter) as I did not manage to capture the color as well. I did on NGC7331 - but with another camera and scope (80mm apo + ASI178mcc):

Screenshot_6.thumb.jpg.d9c789f6b88dd29d27293dd8309a3113.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.