Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Mars - Suggestions for improving


Andy08

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have been getting advise from these forums for a while but never posted anything. I have viewing for around a year and now just started trying my hand at imaging. 

The picture below was taken on the 6th Oct using a Astromaster 70mm (not the best I know but all I can afford at moment and only been in the hobby a year).

A 2 minute video was recorded using Firecapture with a CCD and then processed with PIPP and stacked using AutoStakker. 

I did use a 0.5 focual reducer on the CCD this time to help with tracking, would removing this help? My mount is a manual EQ. Would allowing the object to drift from left to right and then adjusting it back to left many times to increase video length work? Or would the sudden movement cause stacking issues?

 

Thanks for any help


Andy

 

 

 

Mars_223158_lapl5_ap8_Drizzle15_conv.jpg

Edited by Andy08
changed image to jpeg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Andy08

I managed this with an Astromaster 130, 2x Barlow, and Xbox 360 webcam:

 

The avi was about 3 mins long, I let the image drift over the screen then adjusted it back every few seconds. Went straight into AutoStakkert, 50% of the best frames, then sharpened in Registax.

 

This is my first decent image of Mars, and it's worth noting that I've not managed to get one this good since. I've now got some better equipment, but naturally it's been cloudy and not had the chance to give a test yet.

119336279_10157143647247016_3877453127278337794_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stacking process should be selecting the best frames for you so wobbly ones aren't used.

Registax is great at final image wavelet sharpening, though I think there may be too few pixels to work with that cover Mars on the image shared.

Does your camera support ROI (region of interest) when capturing?

You could try a barlow, as a focal reducer will have the opposite effect and make the planet even smaller so whilst you track it for longer on one drift the planet is falling on less of the camera sensor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.