Jump to content

Skywatcher 80ED Pro v Skywatcher 130pds


GrampyG

Recommended Posts

I'd say both are very good, but I'm assuming you'll capture more light with the newtonian.

The APO is easier to carry (probably weighs a max of 2 kg, while the 130PDS weighs 4-5 kg) and doesn't require collimation and it's easier to maintain.

So if you're planning on doing astrophotography in your backyard or somewhere close from home, go with the 130PDS or even the 150PDS (for a bigger aperture).

But if you're living in the middle of a city (Bortle 7-8) and have to drive a couple of hours to go to a Bortle 2-3 place, then the 80ED will be better (even though it is a bit more expensive). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having owned both (well, I still own a 130PDS), the 130PDS is much faster, if you use a SW 0.9x CC much much faster - F4.5 vs F6.37! 😮

The 80ED weighs 4.1kg with tube rings vs 4kg for a 130PDS.

They are both excellent scopes, the 130P-DS is phenomenal value but trickier to use to begin with, and its trickier to balance on the mount as all the mass is at the focuser end the mirror doesn't provide anywhere near enough counterbalance.

So the real differentiators are the price and the great divider of astrophotographers - do you like diffraction spikes or not? ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive used both and both are great and very good for astrophotography. The 80 is not easy to balance, very camera heavy (depending on camera of course) so you will need a counter weight or longer dovetail, i found the 130pds easy to balance with a DSLR. Pleased with the results of both scopes. The 80 is easier to deal with in regards to not having to mess around with collocation, more practical size aswell. As said above, in regards to diffraction spikes on the 130pds, I liked them, some dont and refractors dont produce them. I now only use the 80mm as sold my 130pds, I also have the 72mm ED DS pro, another great little scope. I wouldn't worry to much on how much faster the 130 is, if your keen on astrophotography then I'm sure you will be going onto guiding etc at some point so longer subs achieved which will get you the detail you wont anyway.

Edited by Rustang
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.