Jump to content

Equatorial Wedge for Sky-Watcher 200p Dob


DOBGUYNORTHWEST

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, so I've been looking at upgrading to a new scope with tracking capabilities, but it is just not possible financially at the moment. (BOOHOO)

I have seen this post where someone has made one before for the same scope - https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/236793-equatorial-wedge-for-sky-watcher-200p-dobsonion/#comment-2565512

Am I right in thinking I only have to change the angle of the base for my own design? Being at 53 degrees North, I presume I will have the base at a 53 degree angle?

Also, I have looked at Equatoral Platforms & they seem a bit too complex for my liking, the approach OP took seems to be much more friendly to a low budget and DIY abilities.

Any other suggestions would be helpful too!

Thanks for reading, Curtis.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DOBGUYNORTHWEST said:

change the angle of the base for my own design? Being at 53 degrees North, I presume I will have the base at a 53 degree angle?

I think that your angle will be 37deg, (90 - lat) = (90 - 57), I have not done it myself and do not have your scope so double check what I say and/or wait for a expert to come along ! :)

I think it works like this - if you were at the equator it would need to be 90deg and if you were at the pole you would have 0deg ( an AltAz at the pole is a default Equatorial ! ), and I think the mathematics people would call it the 'Co-latitude' angle.

A problem might be that the altitude bearings ( now becoming the declination bearings ) are maybe not designed to take an end load, so they may be prone to sideways slip as the angle of tilt increases. Depends why you need it to track, if just for manual ease then may not be a prob. but if you are thinking of photography then any flexing could be a no-no ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stu said:

I think an Equatorial Platorm would be a much more satisfactory and stable answer, is that something you could consider making?

Possibly, it looks quite difficult thought. I'm not one for electronics, I have no problems messing about with wood etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SilverAstro said:

I think that your angle will be 37deg, (90 - lat) = (90 - 57), I have not done it myself and do not have your scope so double check what I say and/or wait for a expert to come along ! :)

I think it works like this - if you were at the equator it would need to be 90deg and if you were at the pole you would have 0deg ( an AltAz at the pole is a default Equatorial ! ), and I think the mathematics people would call it the 'Co-latitude' angle.

A problem might be that the altitude bearings ( now becoming the declination bearings ) are maybe not designed to take an end load, so they may be prone to sideways slip as the angle of tilt increases. Depends why you need it to track, if just for manual ease then may not be a prob. but if you are thinking of photography then any flexing could be a no-no ?

 

Thanks for the input! Yeah I was unsure about calculating the correct angle, still am. Hopefully someone comes along with an answer it's all abit confusing! (maths isn't a strong point of mine) :) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DOBGUYNORTHWEST said:

Possibly, it looks quite difficult thought. I'm not one for electronics, I have no problems messing about with wood etc.

I don't think the motorized parts are too complex. Sure you could get help on here with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DOBGUYNORTHWEST said:

Thanks for the input! Yeah I was unsure about calculating the correct angle, still am. Hopefully someone comes along with an answer it's all abit confusing! (maths isn't a strong point of mine) :) 

 

I'm not sure that's correct, I'm at 51.5 degrees north, and point my EQ mount at 51.5 degrees north to spot Polaris so surely your angle needs to be 53 degrees?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Stu said:

Looks good! Sumerian make good stuff

Yeah think I'm gonna go with them to be honest, all the calculations etc are too much for my simple brain haha plus I'm likely to mess up the required angles of cuts etc as everything has to be precise. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.